DNA mark­er x2a’j is prob­a­bly the great­est DNA evi­dence for the Book of Mor­mon thus far.

X2a’j is not found in North Amer­i­ca but its impor­tance to Native Amer­i­can DNA is vir­tu­al­ly unknown. It’s the 5‑ton ele­phant in the room that researcher’s geneti­cist do not want to talk about. Out­side of the Amer­i­can con­ti­nent it’s the most close­ly relat­ed genet­ic link to a found­ing Native Amer­i­can genet­ic DNA mark­er called hap­logroup X. X2a’j is found in Iran. One would expect that if cur­rent the­o­ries about world migra­tion and DNA dat­ing are cor­rect the clos­est genet­ic links to Native Amer­i­can hap­logroup X would be in Siberia, East and cen­tral Asia. Hap­logroup X DNA relat­ed to Native Amer­i­can hap­logroup X is not found in these coun­tries. Hap­logroup X found in the Altains is not relat­ed to Native Amer­i­can hap­logroup X.

The dat­ing of hap­logroup X is trou­ble­some for the Book of Mor­mon but the geo­graph­i­cal dis­tri­b­u­tion of hap­logroup X is spot on. Galilee Druze of Israel have the most genet­ic diver­si­ty of hap­logroup X. It’s been pro­posed that this area in Israel is the place that hap­logroup x dis­persed from. For those who believe in the his­tor­i­cal nar­ra­tive of the Bible and Book of Mor­mon the idea that Native Amer­i­can DNA dis­persed from Israel match­es the scrip­tur­al nar­ra­tive of the Bible and Book of Mor­mon. But the real ques­tion becomes why would the clos­est hap­logroup X genet­ic link to Native of Amer­i­cans be in Iran?

Bor­row­ing from pre­vi­ous research the Bible and Book of Mor­mon explain as fol­lows. The tribe of Man­asseh which Lehi and Nephi are mem­bers of are invad­ed by the Assyr­i­ans and defeat­ed and half of the tribe of Man­asseh are deported.(2 Kings 17:6, 1Chronicles 5:26). In the final depor­ta­tions of Man­asseh, Sar­gon the II deports the north­ern tribes of Israel to the Assyr­i­an empire which includ­ed Media known today as the north­west part of Iran. The Medi­an tribes in 678BC made the first empire of Iran. With these depor­ta­tions it’s also believed the dis­per­sions of the lost ten tribes of Israel to the north begins.

2 Chron­i­cles 30:1–11 explains that the Tribe of Man­asseh was invit­ed back to Jerusalem to wor­ship back at the tem­ple. 2 Kings 17:34 states that they no longer wor­shipped the God of Israel, most like­ly influ­enced by the Assyr­i­an cul­ture and beliefs pro­vid­ed by the Assyr­i­ans. Lehi ances­tors very well could have been some of those invit­ed back to Jerusalem and recon­vert­ed back to their ances­tral Hebrew beliefs. Those who rebelled against Nephi such as Laman, Lemuel and the sons of Ish­mael prob­a­bly revert­ed back to pagan beliefs of Assyr­i­an ori­gin when they arrived in the promise land.

As to why this is the most con­cise DNA evi­dence for the Book of Mor­mon is twofold. There are cul­tur­al and DNA find­ings that match the Book of Mor­mon and Old Tes­ta­ment. The DNA and scrip­tur­al nar­ra­tive is noth­ing with­out the cul­tur­al evi­dence dis­played by Native Amer­i­can cul­ture. I believe not only did Lehi bring Hebrew like cul­ture but Laman and Lemuel or pos­si­bly the Mulekites brought over Assyr­i­an pagan beliefs. The Nez Pierce Indi­ans have the most con­crete exam­ples of Assyr­i­an cul­ture. The Mik Mak Indi­ans have the best exam­ples of Hebrew culture.

Ancient Mesopotami­an Cuneiform tablets were found on Chief Joseph. Cuneiform dates back thou­sands of years to Mesopotamia, to what is now mod­ern day Iraq. Assyr­i­ans also used a form of cuneiform. When Chief Joseph was asked where he got the tablets he said he received them from his fore­fa­thers. The tablet was trans­lat­ed as a bill of sale for animals.

Left: Inanna, Goddess of Love and Queen of Heaven. Right: Inanna in Dimlun

This is an ancient Assyr­i­an relief sculp­ture. The Assyr­i­an God Ash­er sits on his throne. In front of him is a four-point­ed star with a cir­cle in the cen­ter. Radi­at­ing out from between the four points of the star are rays of light. The rays of light radi­ate out in three ribbons:

https://mormonbandwagon.com/files/2015/10/image080.jpg

Assyr­i­an Flag

The Assyr­i­an flag is the flag cho­sen by the Assyr­i­an peo­ple to rep­re­sent the Assyr­i­an nation in the home­land and in the diaspora.

https://mormonbandwagon.com/files/2015/10/image081.jpg

Chief Joseph not only had Cuneiform tablets but his med­i­cine bag has what appears to have the Assyr­i­an Star of Ashur. The star in the mid­dle has four points and what would be the three rib­bons of light com­ing from the star.

http://www.assyriatimes.com/assyrian/knowledge/a‑common-history-of-assyrians-and-native-americans/3401

http://​www​.assyr​i​a​times​.com/​a​s​s​y​r​i​a​n​/​k​n​o​w​l​e​d​g​e​/​c​h​i​e​f​-​j​o​s​e​p​h​-​c​a​r​r​i​e​d​-​t​h​e​-​s​t​a​r​-​o​f​-​a​s​h​u​r/3461

We sur­veyed our Old World hap­logroup X mtD­NAs for the five diag­nos­tic X2a muta­tions (table 2) and found a match only for the tran­si­tion at np 12397 in a sin­gle X2* sequence from Iran. In a par­si­mo­ny tree, this Iran­ian mtD­NA would share a com­mon ances­tor with the Native Amer­i­can clade.”

(Ori­gin and Dif­fu­sion of mtD­NA hap­logroup X, http://​www​.ncbi​.nlm​.nih​.gov/​p​m​c​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​P​M​C​1​1​80497/)

NP 12397 is X2A’J. DNA proof explain­ing the mys­tery of Nez Pierce Indi­ans hav­ing Assyr­i­an cul­ture is iron clad evi­dence in my unpro­fes­sion­al opin­ion. That Assyr­i­an cul­ture to include oth­er old world cul­ture thrived among North Amer­i­can Native Americans.

Peo­ple have tried to explain away Chief Joseph hav­ing cuneiform tablets with seem­ing­ly impos­si­ble expla­na­tions. But to try and explain the cul­tur­al, cuneiform tablets and sup­port­ing DNA evi­dence will take a supreme effort of men­tal gymnastics.

Crit­ics will point out that Native Amer­i­can hap­logroup X in North Amer­i­ca is prob­lem­at­ic it dates to between 11000–13000BC. Well before the Book of Mor­mon. This imme­di­ate­ly dis­qual­i­fies hap­logroup X as DNA evi­dence of the Book of Mor­mon unless of course dat­ing of Native Amer­i­can hap­logroup X is incor­rect. If crit­ics are able to cred­i­bly explain away the Assyr­i­an links and DNA evi­dence found in Iran then the dat­ing of hap­logroup X2a has a leg to stand on oth­er­wise. Native Amer­i­can hap­logroup X can­not be dat­ed ear­li­er then Assyr­i­an cul­ture which start­ed around 3000BC. If you fol­low the scrip­tur­al nar­ra­tive than Ken­nwick man should date after 550BC. At this point the only expla­na­tion for Native Amer­i­can Iran DNA and Assyr­i­an cul­ture is scripture.

Much like the men­tal gym­nas­tics of call­ing a horse a tapir and oth­er exam­ples Mesoamer­i­can apolo­get­ics were laughed to scorn for their hope in the most unlike­li­est cir­cum­stances. Research­es best bet at this point is to con­tin­ue to ignore the DNA evi­dence and hope like Book of Mor­mon Mesoamer­i­can apol­o­gist that DNA evi­dence in their favor will arise.

To see more cul­tur­al links to the old world see link.

Tribe of Man­asseh — Native Amer­i­can DNA

To see tech­nolo­gies that are the equiv­a­lent or the same as old world tech­nolo­gies see link.

Tribe of Man­asseh — Tech­nol­o­gy and Animals


Posted

in

by

Tags:

Comments

42 responses to “X2A’J Bible and Book of Mormon DNA”

  1. Bridgett Austin Avatar
    Bridgett Austin

    I’d like to add to this dis­cus­sion. Maybe these genes are from the giants and that’s why they are most sim­i­lar to …I don’t know what I’m sup­posed to say here… white peo­ple. I know from my dreams of my past lives that there were giants that were white with red hair and curly beards. Large lamp-like blue eyes and I was a very tall man and only came up to around his waist. He lived on an island in around Ire­land. His habi­ta­tion was a large, cir­cu­lar wood­work and it was at the high­est point. It was some kind of fes­ti­val time around March and he seemed to be the pre­sid­ing dig­ni­tary. The island was teem­ing with the locals who were of medi­um height, blond hair and blue eyes. I was not from around there and seemed much more urban and sophis­ti­cat­ed. I Was very tall, thin and had green eyes and black hair. We were talk­ing about this demon I was hunt­ing and that’s why I had land­ed there in my ship. As we were walk­ing around we noticed a child alone pick­ing flow­ers I saw his eyes light on her and I knew he want­ed to eat her. I quick­ly said this lit­tle girl has lost her moth­er and took her away quick­ly to find her neg­li­gent moth­er. While I was away the demon land­ed and the giant betrayed me and my plans. I got back in time to see his ship sail­ing off and board­ed my ship and caught up with him. I brought my boat up along­side his and board­ed. (They weren’t very large.) Fac­ing him I drew my sword of pol­ished steel it had a han­dle like Span­ish fenc­ing swords but was a broadsword. He was even taller and even thin­ner than I was with long straight hair like sil­ver moon­light, alabaster white skin(I mean white!) and glow­ing blue eyes. He was also bet­ter look­ing than human men. He was also evil and to kill him I had to strike off his head. He stood fac­ing me for a moment than smiled and turned and dove into the ocean. I dived in after like a fool, imme­di­ate­ly real­iz­ing it was a trick and know­ing then that giant had betrayed me. As I woke up from the dream I was aware of reced­ing back to mod­ern times and my cur­rent body. I remem­ber rue­ful­ly mourn­ing those boots I was wear­ing as they were mas­ter­ful­ly made and with tech­niques lost to ancient his­to­ry. I had anoth­er dream about that life­time a day lat­er in which I faced a sor­cer­er in the same area (Ire­land or Scot­land) and he had a tree hung with all the heads of war­riors he had defeat­ed. I remem­ber see­ing a head with long light blond hair hang­ing with the oth­er 30 odd heads and his eyes were open and faint­ly glow­ing blue even though he was dead, he was a half demon and my friend. The evil sor­cer­er came down the hill from his tow­er. Lit­er­al­ly just a tall tow­er. I put an end to him. You ever hear if you save some­one’s life you are respon­si­ble for it? The child I saved is now my daugh­ter and she has blond hair and blue eyes. Again. I was born with black hair. Again. I ini­tial­ly asked God in my mind if rein­car­na­tion was real one day when I was 16 and that night I had my first dream about anoth­er life­time. I’m Chero­kee, Scot­tish and French and have always believed in God. When I met my great uncle of my Chero­kee grand­fa­ther for the first time he said he thought he knew me from a past life and I had­n’t told him who I was yet. Seems to me psy­chic abil­i­ties are passed through the blood. I live by the Ohio riv­er and I have recent­ly found out the mound builders were relat­ed to the Olmec and Mayans. Obvi­ous­ly, their chiefs and priests were giants. They inter­bred with the locals and their descen­dants are still here. My moth­er was 6’ft tall. We both have this bump/bone on the out­sole of our feet and I can eas­i­ly dis­lo­cate my jaw at will betray­ing my ser­pent blood­line. In fact, I found out the name of this area from a dream, the Val­ley of the Ser­pent Kings. We look noth­ing like the so-called Chero­kee tribe of today. They look like Eski­mo peo­ple to me. An awful lot of mis­in­for­ma­tion out there today and a lot of wannabe cult leader type shit going on, buy my book blah, blah, blah. The truth is free. Just ask God. Also, yes Jesus is who he said he was and the King James Bible is true and I’ve ver­i­fied much through it. Still not sure where the black haired green eyed peo­ple came from orig­i­nal­ly and now there seems no place to real­ly see that type except the French some­times. Though obvi­ous­ly a great deal of peo­ple have scat­tered across the globe through­out time some­thing I’ve come to know is that you rein­car­nate in the same blood­lines and see the same peo­ple again and again. That’s not to say only in one fam­i­ly as in my imme­di­ate past life I was a North Kore­an girl who lived to about ten and lived as a sex slave in a huge palace. I had a guard with pock­marks who was my lover and appar­ent­ly was found out. (I had this dream on a vac­tion in New Orleans on my last night there) I saw him at an Atlanta gas sta­tion when I was sev­en­teen the night after I had the dream. I just stared at him in dis­be­lief and he looked straight at me and I could see how deeply unhap­py he was but as I looked in his eyes, some­thing hap­pened. I think in his heart he knew who I was. Then my great-grand­moth­er prod­ded me into the vehi­cle and that was that. The life before that I lived in this very same town and was a tall thin woman with, you guessed it, black hair and green eyes. The street she grew up on has my last name now and when I was try­ing to find the grave I asked God in my mind if this is real and the truth then give me a sign. I heard a crow caw­ing and stopped walk­ing and looked down to see I was stand­ing on the grave. I’ve also seen the future and the Chi­nese are going to invade us. I will be 12 and I will be here in this town from hell again. Most every­one will be dead and they will be stack­ing up the bod­ies and strip­ping the flesh off to eat it. I will be almost dead of star­va­tion when I am found by a com­man­der or Gen­er­al inspect­ing the man­sion I am in. When the bomb dropped through the roof it did­n’t det­o­nate. Just killed my par­ents. Leav­ing me alone. I have feel­ing he is the same tyrant I escaped from my oth­er life as a Kore­an girl. I will be his con­cu­bine and trav­el with him. The build­ing the bod­ies were piled in in this dream was actu­all built sev­er­al years after I had this dream. It is a red cross build­ing. It is down the road sev­er­al miles from the grave of my for­mer self and right down the street from a house I grew up in that has untouched woods for miles behind it and a creek that I found arrow­heads and arti­facts in as a child. I also saw ufos one time in broad day­light back there and had dreams of being tak­en under­ground and that there was an entrance to the under­world back there that only the ancient Indi­ans knew about. I have since learned there are indeed caves and old mines right there that have since been closed up for like 130 years now. Old micro­film from the library showed an ad for a state park for this cave that was turned into a mine and some kind of acci­dent led to them seal­ing the cave and appar­ent­ly almost no one in town knows it even ever exist­ed so I went out with the instruc­tion from the old news­pa­per and locat­ed a lit­tle dead end road called,you guessed it, Cave Rd. God is fun­ny. So many coin­ci­dences. Well, I hope that some­one can learn some­thing from my shar­ing this small por­tion of what I have learned. I used to tell peo­ple about these things as they hap­pened but no one believes me or cares I guess. I’m a lon­er. I’m very good look­ing and intel­li­gent but have done poor­ly in this life. The world is now teem­ing with witch­es and vile type peo­ple. Don’t they know how these sto­ries always end? Real­ly like the bible says they are as numer­ous as blades of grass. God, peo­ple used to be so much bet­ter look­ing and so much smarter! I will soon be leav­ing this body and it kind of makes me sad. Real­ly I hoped I would find some­one like me but I don’t think that is going to hap­pen. All the same this is the truth like or not. David McK­ane, my grand­pa Austin was a 33rd degree Scot­tish Free Rite Mason. He grew cal­bash­es and hung them around his prop­er­ty. I lat­er found out that is what witch­es do to give their dif­fer­ent spir­its a place to live. (À la decap­i­tat­ed heads on a tree) I also found a shirt of mine that was miss­ing under the eave of his garage, I lat­er learned witch­es do that to curse or even kill a per­son. When I was 9 I took a 14 foot drop to the head my life passed before my eyes and after­ward I would­n’t touch pork for some rea­son and around that time real­ized grand­pa ate turkey bacon and grand­ma nev­er ever cooked pork of anykind. You see, I now know it low­ers your spir­i­tu­al vibra­tion. I hope you can leave this Mor­mon stuff behind you don’t waste your­self on lies. God’s peo­ple are not of this world or loved by it. Remem­ber that. The fact is our blood­lines are almost all impure and this whole world is going to be destroyed by God, again, and we will be remade, again. I’m look­ing for­ward to it.

  2. Wes T
    Wes T

    David,

    I’d love to hear more about your beliefs about car­bon dat­ing. You state that the X2AJ DNA has been dat­ed through the Ken­nwick skele­ton to a range from 3750 BC to 7000 BC. I under­stand that is a large range, how­ev­er not even the youngest date in that range aligns with the Book of Mor­mon timeline.

    You state that “Radio car­bon dat­ing is based on know­ing how much car­bon diox­ide is in the atmos­phere at the time there dat­ing the spec­i­men to and oth­er vari­ables. I frankly do not trust their vari­ables.” That is an impor­tant vari­able, and there is sol­id evi­dence indi­cat­ing the lev­els of car­bon diox­ide (C12 and C14) in the atmos­phere back at least 8000 years. By mea­sur­ing the C12 and C14 in very old dead trees and count­ing the thou­sands of rings of those trees, along with the thou­sands of rings of recent­ly alive trees, sci­en­tists have ver­i­fied that radio­car­bon is accu­rate with­in at least that peri­od. After about 20,000 years, there is so lit­tle car­bon left in pre­vi­ous­ly organ­ic objects that radio­car­bon dat­ing is not reli­able — the mea­sure­ment is essen­tial­ly indis­tin­guish­able from back­ground radiation.
    I of course can­not force you to accept the sol­id sci­ence of radio­car­bon dat­ing, but if you’d like some­where to start to under­stand it bet­ter, I found a fair­ly easy to read sum­ma­ry (com­pared to many of the oth­er more tech­ni­cal and bor­ing sources) refut­ing many of the com­mon cri­tiques of radio­car­bon dat­ing: https://​ncse​.com/​c​e​j​/​3​/​2​/​a​n​s​w​e​r​s​-​t​o​-​c​r​e​a​t​i​o​n​i​s​t​-​a​t​t​a​c​k​s​-​c​a​r​b​o​n​-​1​4​-​d​ating/.

    Again, I would love to hear why exact­ly you don’t trust their vari­ables, and what expla­na­tion you have for the very old radio­car­bon dat­ing results of, for exam­ple, the Ken­nwick man.

    1. Dave Mack
      Dave Mack

      At this point in time I think the DNA evi­dence and cul­tur­al evi­dence is a more accu­rate rep­re­sen­ta­tion of dat­ing then what radio car­bon dat­ing is showing.

      1. Wes T
        Wes T

        Ok, so to clar­i­fy, you are will­ful­ly dis­re­gard­ing strong evi­dence that dis­cred­its your hypoth­e­sis, just because you don’t like it? You are cher­ry-pick­ing the evi­dence that coin­ci­den­tal­ly sup­ports your posi­tion and ignor­ing all the evi­dence that doesn’t.

        Your hypoth­e­sis is con­sis­tent­ly not cred­i­ble because it is based on cher­ry-pick­ing what sup­ports your posi­tion rather than con­sid­er­ing all the evi­dence for and against your posi­tion. You can cher­ry-pick evi­dence in any cul­ture and make incred­i­ble claims. Sym­bols like your “Assyr­i­an flag” are, in my opin­ion, the most like­ly coin­ci­den­tal matches.

        Take for exam­ple, the Jew­ish “Star of David” — it is sup­posed evi­dence that “The Jews and all mod­ern reli­gious tra­di­tions orig­i­nat­ed in ancient India”
        accord­ing to this arti­cle: http://​www​.above​topse​cret​.com/​f​o​r​u​m​/​t​h​r​e​a​d​8​1​2​2​95/pg1. My point being that the use of sim­i­lar sym­bols is not gen­er­al­ly con­sid­ered evi­dence of the same ori­gin. I think we’ve all doo­dled some­thing sim­i­lar to the design on Chief Joseph’s med­i­cine bag, just because it is a fair­ly sim­ple pat­tern that can spon­ta­neous­ly occur, just like the Star of David symbol.

        Tying it back to the DNA evi­dence you present, all togeth­er it shows that there are a vari­ety of migra­tions from oth­er con­ti­nents. That specif­i­cal­ly refutes the Book of Mor­mon claims like 2 Nephi 1:6 and 9 that “there shall none come into this land save they shall be brought by the hand of the Lord” and that “[Nephi’s fam­i­ly] may pos­sess this land unto themselves”.
        The only DNA evi­dence that one of the many migra­tions may have been from a mid­dle-east­ern group (like Lehi’s fam­i­ly) has strong evi­dence that it was from thou­sands of years pri­or to the Lehi sto­ry. This means it is no longer cred­i­ble evi­dence that sup­ports your hypoth­e­sis. Your claims are sim­i­lar to those claim­ing dinosaurs and humans coex­ist­ed because of an ancient human drew a pic­ture of a dinosaur-like crea­ture: http://​www​.above​topse​cret​.com/​f​o​r​u​m​/​t​h​r​e​a​d​7​4​0​9​87/pg1. Such con­clu­sions are based pure­ly on ignor­ing mul­ti­tudes of con­trary sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence and exalt­ing like­ly inci­den­tal sim­i­lar­i­ties as evi­dence. This is cher­ry-pick­ing at its worst, and I hope even­tu­al­ly you can see that ( https://​www​.log​i​cal​ly​fal​la​cious​.com/​t​o​o​l​s​/​l​p​/​B​o​/​L​o​g​i​c​a​l​F​a​l​l​a​c​i​e​s​/​6​5​/​C​h​e​r​r​y​-​P​icking ).

        Please do explain, why do you find it at all eth­i­cal to sup­port your claims with such bla­tant cherry-picking?

        1. Dave Mack
          Dave Mack

          I have to go with the sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence that is most accu­rate when they con­flict with each oth­er. As you stat­ed there were mul­ti­ple migra­tions to the Amer­i­c­as. But migra­tions do not fit the ter­mi­nol­o­gy very well. There were mul­ti­ple trans ocean voy­ages. To include a Poly­ne­sian, Aus­tralian, and most def­i­nite­ly a mid­dle east­ern voy­age all three of those dna mark­ers are found in the Amer­i­c­as. The mid­dle east mark­er found among North Amer­i­can Indi­ans. The dna evi­dence is sup­port­ive of some Asian hap­lo groups mak­ing it to the Amer­i­c­as via ocean voy­ages. Cer­tain Asian hap­logroups are miss­ing in key areas to show a migra­tion across a bar­ren ice bridge. Some of the Asian hap­lo groups being absent are in mod­ern day and paleo Eski­mos. The biggest argu­ment that once was against the Book of Mor­mon in terms of DNA is now its biggest defense iron­ic I know. What the prob­lem is dna evi­dence con­flicts with the dat­ing of Hap­lo Group x and oth­er Hap­lo groups, unless of course cave men were sail­ing across the oceans. Anoth­er exam­ple and mys­tery is that there was a migra­tion to Aus­tralia 40000 years ago. Last time I checked Aus­tralia was an island. I’m going with the dna evi­dence its sup­port­ed by cul­tur­al evi­dence. Sci­en­tist need to make the vari­ables with radio car­bon dat­ing match up with cul­tur­al and dna evi­dence. They changed the first dat­ing of Ken­nwick man by 3450 years. That same num­ber used in the oppo­site direc­tion falls well with­in the Book of Mor­mon timeline.

          The Book of Mor­mon men­tions three migra­tions to North Amer­i­ca. For those voy­ages not men­tioned in the Book of Mor­mon I think it’s safe to assume God had his hand in it. The Assyr­i­an time­line falls with­in the Book of Mor­mon. What I found out recent­ly is that Chief Joseph Cuneiform tablet specif­i­cal­ly names the moon God­dess nan­na. I wrote in my Hebrew and Cul­tur­al links that I believed the cres­cent shape objects found in pre­his­to­ry arche­o­log­i­cal sites and worn by ear­ly Native Amer­i­cans was an Assyr­i­an moon God Sin. Doing more research sin was the incor­rect god the cor­rect god is the moon god­dess Nan­na. Chief Joseph had on his med­i­cine bag an Assyr­i­an star of Ashur. His med­i­cine bag prob­a­bly had the cuneiform tablet that men­tions one of the gods they and their ances­tors wor­shipped Nan­na. Inna anoth­er god that Assyr­i­ans wor­shipped is on the Shawnee creek stone. The cul­tur­al and dna evi­dence all match up. It con­flicts by thou­sands of years with cur­rent dat­ing of mid­dle east­ern dna arrival to America.

          The rea­son­ing for this belief is that arche­ol­o­gist were sur­prised that Hopewell (Nephites) had vir­tu­al­ly no cres­cent shaped arti­facts. While oth­er non Hopewell sites had numer­ous cres­cent shaped arti­facts. I will have to add this lat­er. Sar­gon II who deport­ed the tribe of Man­asseh to the Assyr­i­an Empire specif­i­cal­ly wor­shipped the Assyr­i­an god Nan­na. His daugh­ters were made the priest­ess of this cres­cent shaped God. Also one researcher describes the name nan­na as being spe­cial­ly to the Assyr­i­an culture.

  3. Dave Mack
    Dave Mack

    mol­ly

    In the almost 200 years the church has nev­er stopped grow­ing year after year. Rates of those growth have spiked then fall­en but growth has always been con­stant and it con­tin­ues to grow. Some coun­tries have excel­lent growth rates.

  4. Dave Mack
    Dave Mack

    Mol­ly

    The bible vers­es are self explanatory

  5. Simon Avatar
    Simon

    David,

    The same hap­logroup X found in liv­ing Native Amer­i­cans was present in Native Amer­i­can pop­u­la­tions that lived 8,000 years ago. This fact demon­strates your claims are false.

    1. Dave Mack
      Dave Mack

      If this is the same simon we have dis­cussed this top­ic before so I will repost my reply. The radio car­bon dat­ing of hap­lo group x comes through ken­nwick man.

      When it comes to dat­ing Ken­newick man a skele­ton with Hap­logroup x dna he dat­ed to 9000 BP (7000BC) after sev­er­al attempts.
      Ken­nwick man has been dat­ed to 3750BC, 6410BC, 4130BC, and 6130BC. Those are some wide ranges. In my unpro­fes­sion­al and biased opin­ion the sci­en­tist based on their own bias­es kept dat­ing Ken­newick man until they got the date they want­ed. Radio car­bon dat­ing is based on know­ing how much car­bon diox­ide is in the atmos­phere at the time there dat­ing the spec­i­men to and oth­er vari­ables. I frankly do not trust their vari­ables. I believe the old world (Hebrew) lan­guage and cul­ture and tech­nol­o­gy found among the Hopewell Ade­na and Native Amer­i­cans is a bet­ter indi­ca­tion of age. Not to men­tion there is no dna evi­dence for a Bering Ice Bridge cross­ing not only for Hap­lo group x but oth­er Hap­lo groups. See tech­nol­o­gy and Hebrew cul­ture ties that I believe show cor­rect dating.

      http://​www​.nps​.gov/​a​r​c​h​e​o​l​o​g​y​/​k​e​n​n​e​w​i​c​k​/​c​1​4​m​e​mo.htm

      Tech­nol­o­gy
      https://mormonbandwagon.com/dave/tribe-manasseh‑3/

      Hebrew cul­tur­al ties
      https://mormonbandwagon.com/dave/tribe-manasseh‑4/

      I believe that the solutre­an and Bering ice bridge for the pop­u­lat­ing of the Amer­i­ca con­ti­nent to be false. But the solutre­an has more dna evi­dence for it than the Bering ice bridge the­o­ry. But your right the major­i­ty of sci­en­tist con­sid­er the solutre­an the­o­ry to be unacceptable.

      Here are some pre­vi­ous­ly post­ed com­ments about radio car­bon dat­ing and holes in the Bering Ice Bridge theory.

      Although hgs A, B, C, D, and X are the five found­ing mtD­NA hap­logroups in the Amer­i­c­as, pre­vi­ous stud­ies have shown the near-absence of hgs B, C, and X in Paleo-Eski­mos and Thule, as well as among present-day Inu­it (25, 43–47).”

      Besides the dna evi­dence I’m using the Hebrew cul­tur­al ties and tech­nol­o­gy to prove the bib­li­cal time­line cross­ing. As far as the tech­nol­o­gy the woven cloth cloth­ing, met­al­lur­gy, breast­plates, and fortress­es is con­firmed by mod­ern archae­o­log­i­cal evidence.
      DNA evi­dence is also caus­ing prob­lems for the Bering Ice Bridge THEORY. It was first believed there was one migra­tion 50000 thou­sand years ago. Then it changed to three migra­tions about 20000 thou­sand years ago and now sci­en­tist believe that hap­lo group x crossed (for which there is no evi­dence for) 13000 years ago.

      No they are adding more migra­tions than just three.

      There­fore, an addi­tion­al Paleo-Eski­mo migra­tion wave should be added to the three-wave hypoth­e­sis in explain­ing the peo­pling of the Americas”

      South Amer­i­ca has Poly­ne­sian dna. So some sci­en­tist believe Poly­ne­sians sailed to South Amer­i­ca. To say that they sailed to South Amer­i­ca pri­or to 12000 bc would be absurd.

      South Amer­i­ca has Aus­tralian dna but there is no Aus­tralian found in Asia or Siberia or the Near East.

      http://​www​.smith​so​ni​an​mag​.com/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​-​n​a​t​u​r​e​/​D​N​A​-​s​e​a​r​c​h​-​f​i​r​s​t​-​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​s​-​l​i​n​k​s​-​a​m​a​z​o​n​-​i​n​d​i​g​e​n​o​u​s​-​a​u​s​t​r​a​l​i​a​n​s​-​1​8​0​9​5​5​9​7​6​/​?​no-ist

  6. molly_miller

    Did chief Joseph live in North Amer­i­ca or Cen­tral Amer­i­ca ? One won­ders where the Book of Mor­mon peo­ple lived since we have Book of Mor­mon tours in Cen­tral America

    1. Dave Mack
      Dave Mack

      There are two major the­o­ries of thought of where the Book of Mor­mon took place Cen­tral Amer­i­ca and North Amer­i­ca. You can take Book of Mor­mon tours not only in Cen­tral Amer­i­ca but also North America.

      1. Molly Miller Avatar

        You are right they are the­o­ries with no con­crete facts

        1. Dave Mack
          Dave Mack

          Mol­ly
          Most peo­ple believe that con­firmed Book of Mor­mon like arti­facts such as breast­plates head­plates, woven cloth, met­al weapons, neck­laces, but­tons, etc that are all con­firmed Book of Mor­mon time peri­od is all great evi­dence. The north Amer­i­can mod­el has arche­o­log­i­cal sites and artifacts.

          Arti­fact evi­dence is gen­er­al­ly known as evi­dence believe it or not.

          https://mormonbandwagon.com/dave/tribe-manasseh‑3/

          1. Molly Miller Avatar

            Mor­mons teach there god was a fall­en, exalt­ed, saved, finite man like Abra­ham, Isaac and Jacob So of course the Book of Mor­mon not true

            The Gods who dwell in the Heaven…have been redeemed from the grave in a world which exist­ed before the foun­da­tions of this earth were laid. They and the Heav­en­ly body which they now inhab­it were once in a fall­en state.…they were exalt­ed also, from fall­en men to Celes­tial Gods to inhab­it their Heav­en for­ev­er and ever.” (Apos­tle Orson Pratt in The Seer, page 23)

            Would you think fall­en means sin­ner In the 1844 LDS pub­li­ca­tion, Times and Sea­sons, vol­ume 5, pages 613–614,… Joseph Smith reit­er­at­ed that God was an exalt­ed man and that Mor­mon men could also become Gods. This teach­ing is well doc­u­ment­ed, as is their claim that God is not a spir­it being, but that he has a body of flesh and bone.

            God is a per­fect­ed, saved soul enjoy­ing eter­nal life.” (Sec­ond Coun­selor in the First Pres­i­den­cy, Mar­i­on G. Rom­ney, as per Salt Lake Tri­bune, April 3, 1977.)

            It appears ridicu­lous to the world, under their dark­ened and erro­neous tra­di­tions, that God has once been a finite being; and yet we are not in such close com­mu­nion with him as many have sup­posed. He has passed on, and is exalt­ed far beyond what we can now com­pre­hend. Brigham Young, Jour­nal of Dis­cours­es, vol. 7, p. 334

            Doc­trine and Covenant’s 132:
            20: 20 Then shall they be gods, because they have no end; there­fore shall they be from ever­last­ing to ever­last­ing, because they con­tin­ue; then shall they be above all, because all things are sub­ject unto them. Then shall they be gods, because they have all pow­er, and the angels are sub­ject unto them.
            37 Abra­ham received con­cu­bines, and they bore him chil­dren; and it was account­ed unto him for right­eous­ness, because they were giv­en unto him, and he abode in my law; as Isaac also and Jacob did none oth­er things than that which they were com­mand­ed; and because they did none oth­er things than that which they were com­mand­ed, they have entered into their exal­ta­tion, accord­ing to the promis­es, and sit upon thrones, and are not angels but are gods.

          2. Dave Mack
            Dave Mack

            I don’t know if this is the right forum to dis­cuss your com­ment but what the heck might as well.

            The bible teach­es the same thing that man can be exalt­ed and become like Heav­en­ly Father. Look at Jesus Christ, he was once a mor­tal being who is now an exalt­ed being.

            Psalms 82:6
            6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are chil­dren of the most High.

            Christ quotes him­self. John 10:34
            34 Jesus answered them, Is it not writ­ten in your law, I said, Ye are gods?

            Christ was not per­fect until after his mor­tal exis­tence he learned from that which he suf­fered. After his res­ur­rec­tion only then was he per­fect. Luke 13:32 Hebrew 5:8,9

            32 And he said unto them, Go ye, and tell that fox, Behold, I cast out dev­ils, and I do cures to day and to mor­row, and the third day I shall be perfected.

            8 Though he were a Son, yet learned he obe­di­ence by the things which he suffered;

            9 And being made per­fect, he became the author of eter­nal sal­va­tion unto all them that obey him;

            Christ tells the peo­ple to be per­fect like Heav­en­ly father he does not include him­self. After his res­ur­rec­tion and per­fec­tion he tells the Nephites to be per­fect like him­self and Heav­en­ly Father.
            Math­ew 5:28
            48 Be ye there­fore per­fect, even as your Father which is in heav­en is perfect.
            3Nephi 12:48
            48 There­fore I would that ye should be per­fect even as I, or your Father who is in heav­en is perfect.

            I could add more scrip­tures but I do not have all day to look up all the vers­es I think you get the jest of what the Bible is say­ing but I could add a lot more just let me know.

          3. Dave Mack
            Dave Mack

            Mol­ly,

            I was just going by what the bible says. If you want to dis­agree with bible feel free.

          4. molly_miller

            James Tal­mage, a Mor­mon Apos­tle, said Psalm 82:6 is notabout becom­ing gods. “In Psalm 82:6,judges invest­ed by divine appoint­ment are called ‘gods.’ To this scrip­ture the­Sav­ior referred in His reply to the Jews in Solomon’s Porch. Judges soau­tho­rized offi­ci­at­ed as the rep­re­sen­ta­tives of God and are hon­ored by the exalt­edti­tle ‘gods.’ Com­pare the sim­i­lar appel­la­tion applied to Moses (Exo. 4:16;7:1). Jesus Christ pos­sessed divine autho­riza­tion, not through the word of God­trans­mit­ted to Him by man, but as an inher­ent attribute. The incon­sis­ten­cy ofcall­ing human judges ‘gods,’ and of ascrib­ing blas­phe­my to the Christ who­called Him­self the Son of God, would have been appar­ent to the Jews but fortheir sin-dark­ened minds.” (James Tal­mage, Jesus the Christ, p. 501). –Mor­mons often quote Psalm 82:6 which Jesus quot­ed in John 10:30–34 to show thatwe can become gods. Rather than them believ­ing the truth from a Christian,perhaps they will believe it from their own apostle

  7. tapirrider Avatar
    tapirrider

    Peo­ple have tried to explain away Chief Joseph hav­ing cuneiform tablets with seem­ing­ly impos­si­ble explanations.”

    Non­sense. The only source that Chief Joseph had them and the things he alleged­ly said about them came from one per­son who wrote with­out sources for Chief Joseph’s alleged words to back up her claims. Mary Gin­dling’s post does not make it so.
    https://web.archive.org/web/20100131104033/http://www.helium.com/items/1636848-hisdtory-mystery-chief-josephs-cuneiform-tablet

    The Smith­son­ian Mag­a­zine of Feb­ru­ary, 1979 gives very plau­si­ble expla­na­tions. David, just because the tablet is authen­tic does not prove that Chief Joseph ever even owned it or had it in his pos­ses­sion. Edgar James Banks brought per­haps thou­sands of those items into the Unit­ed States and sold them, long after the Bat­tle of Bear Paw. The first time the tablet showed up was at West Point in a box of items labeled as Chief Joseph’s belong­ings. It is most like­ly and the best plau­si­ble expla­na­tion, that the tablet had been pur­chased in the ear­ly 20th Cen­tu­ry from Banks and end­ed up with those oth­er items, either before they were donat­ed or the muse­um itself screwed up and mis­placed and mis­labled one of its own artifacts.

    When a ratio­nal per­son con­sid­ers that your DNA claim is flawed and has stud­ied the geo­met­ric pat­terns of Amer­i­can Indi­an art and bead­work and is famil­iar with the cul­tur­al sig­nif­i­cance and mean­ings of the pat­terns and their uses by the var­i­ous dif­fer­ent tribes, your entire claim col­laps­es with the real­i­ty that the tablet was a com­mon item in the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry Unit­ed States. It is obvi­ous to any­one who is look­ing for truth with­out bias that the source of the tablet was from Banks and Chief Joseph nev­er had it.

    C. E. S. Wood, “Chief Joseph, the Nez Per­cé,” The Cen­tu­ry: a Pop­u­lar Quar­ter­ly 28, no. 1 (May 1884): 141.
    https://​books​.google​.cat/​b​o​o​k​s​?​i​d​=​i​D​t​G​A​Q​A​A​M​A​A​J​&​p​g​=​P​A​1​4​2​&​d​q​#​v​=​o​n​e​p​a​g​e​&​q​&​f​=false

    In Red Earth White Lies, orig­i­nal­ly pub­lished 1995, Delo­ria erro­neous­ly claims that Chief Joseph gave the pen­dant to Gen­er­al Miles.
    https://​books​.google​.com/​b​o​o​k​s​?​i​d​=​P​z​7​8​t​S​w​R​A​a​U​C​&​p​g​=​P​A​4​8​&​l​p​g​=​P​A​4​8​&​d​q​#​v​=​o​n​e​p​a​g​e​&​q​&​f​=false

    The indi­vid­ual who donat­ed the items to the West Point muse­um was Stu­art Heintzel­man, who obtained them from his father Charles Stu­art Heintzel­man. They were donat­ed in the ear­ly 20th cen­tu­ry. And just a lit­tle bit of thought makes the ques­tion scream out, why would Chief Joseph give such a sacred object to Gen­er­al Miles? Delo­ri­a’s source was Mary Gindling.

    There is no 19th cen­tu­ry account of Chief Joseph hav­ing that tablet, no account of him giv­ing it to any­one. All of this garbage began with Mary Gin­dling, based on a mix-up of muse­um objects. And Mary’s writ­ing was after Bar­ry Fel­l’s first pub­li­ca­tion of Amer­i­ca BC and he nev­er men­tioned it. So in con­clu­sion, just because an arti­fact is authen­tic, it does not authen­ti­cate pseu­do claims. The most plau­si­ble expla­na­tion is almost always the truth and in this case, it is a com­mon object that was brought in to the Unit­ed States after the events of the Nez Percé.

    1. Dave Mack
      Dave Mack

      Giv­en the Native Amer­i­can cul­tur­al and DNA ties to Iran and the ancient Assyr­i­an empire. I have no prob­lem believ­ing that the authen­tic cuneiform tablet was giv­en to chief Joseph by his fore­fa­thers who are genet­i­cal­ly tied to Iran.

      1. tapirrider Avatar
        tapirrider

        David, there is no cred­i­ble cul­tur­al ties of the Nez Per­cé to Iran and your DNA claims are not in agree­ment with sci­ence. And giv­en that there is no 19th evi­dence via pho­to­graph or writ­ten doc­u­ment tying that tablet to Chief Joseph, all you have is a belief with no back­ing. Your faith is admirable but in this case it would seem misguided.

        1. Dave Mack
          Dave Mack

          When it comes to the cul­tur­al evi­dence, its quite obvi­ous. If you are in denial that is your problem.

          1. tapirrider Avatar
            tapirrider

            No David, your alleged cul­tur­al evi­dence is not cred­i­ble. My posi­tion is not a mat­ter of denial, nor is it a prob­lem I have. The facts and evi­dence sim­ply do not sup­port your claims. I can back up my posi­tion with reli­able, cred­i­ble and rep­utable sources, while you must twist the find­ings and con­clu­sions of sci­en­tists, archae­ol­o­gists and schol­ars to fit your ideas. You have to dis­re­gard radio­car­bon dates that dis­agree with your claims and ignore the improve­ments in the mol­e­c­u­lar clock mea­sure­ment. It is a fact that you use known hoax arti­facts and you have tried to attribute that valid arti­fact tablet from Mesopotamia to Chief Joseph when there is no evi­dence that he actu­al­ly ever had it, and you do this in the face of all indi­ca­tions that it entered the Unit­ed States in the ear­ly 1900s.

            Denial is refus­ing to acknowl­edge cred­i­ble evi­dence, refus­ing to accept that lack of evi­dence to sup­port a claim indi­cates that one’s posi­tion might actu­al­ly be wrong, dis­put­ing and dis­agree­ing with the estab­lished con­sen­sus with­out valid or cred­i­ble grounds to stand on, and allow­ing one’s own bias and desire for some­thing to be true to inter­fere with accept­ing real­i­ty. My prob­lem is just the oppo­site. I can­not allow myself to believe in fan­ta­sy, no mat­ter how bad­ly I might want to.

          2. Dave Mack
            Dave Mack

            Well there you go again try­ing to white wash all the arti­facts con­firmed by mod­ern arche­ol­o­gy. You have your opin­ion I have mine the read­er can make their own opinion.

          3. tapirrider Avatar
            tapirrider

            David, I am not “try­ing to white wash” any­thing. My posi­tion is not an opin­ion, it is based on cred­i­ble evi­dence and facts, in line with the estab­lished con­sen­sus of sci­en­tists, archae­ol­o­gists, anthro­pol­o­gists, his­to­ri­ans and edu­ca­tors. The claims that you present are in error and entire­ly unnec­es­sary con­cern­ing the Book of Mor­mon. If Moroni 10:3–5 can’t estab­lish the truth then no amount of dis­tort­ed claims will either.

      2. Dave Mack
        Dave Mack

        The Book of Mor­mon can def­i­nite­ly hold its own nobody can dis­prove it. Its abil­i­ty to draw peo­ple to Christ is wit­nessed by mil­lions from its first publication.

        As far as my hob­by there are plen­ty of sci­en­tist and anthro­pol­o­gist who have noticed that dna dis­tri­b­u­tion and cur­rent the­o­ries are not lin­ing up.

        The pre­vail­ing the­o­ry is that the first Amer­i­cans arrived in a sin­gle wave, and all Native Amer­i­can pop­u­la­tions today descend from this one group of adven­tur­ous founders. But now there’s a kink in that theory. “
        “If Aleut­ian Islanders or their ances­tors had some­how mixed with an Aus­tralasian group up north or made their way south to the Ama­zon, they’d leave genet­ic clues along the way. “It’s not a clear alter­na­tive,” argues Reich. “
        “Three Ama­zon­ian groups—Suruí, Kari­tiana and Xavante—all had more in com­mon with Aus­tralasians than any group in Siberia. “
        “Both stud­ies there­fore sug­gest that the ances­try of the first Amer­i­cans is a lot more com­pli­cat­ed than sci­en­tists had envisioned.”
        “There is a greater diver­si­ty of Native Amer­i­can found­ing pop­u­la­tions than pre­vi­ous­ly thought,” says Skoglund. “And these found­ing pop­u­la­tions con­nect indige­nous groups in far apart places of the world.”

        http://​www​.smith​so​ni​an​mag​.com/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​-​n​a​t​u​r​e​/​D​N​A​-​s​e​a​r​c​h​-​f​i​r​s​t​-​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​s​-​l​i​n​k​s​-​a​m​a​z​o​n​-​i​n​d​i​g​e​n​o​u​s​-​a​u​s​t​r​a​l​i​a​n​s​-​1​8​0​9​5​5​9​7​6​/​?​no-ist

        1. tapirrider Avatar
          tapirrider

          The Book of Mor­mon isn’t hold­ing its own any­more though. Con­ver­sion rates are at an all time low, reten­tion of new con­verts is extreme­ly prob­lem­at­ic and even long time mem­bers from multi­gen­er­a­tional fam­i­lies are leav­ing. Esti­mates of active mem­bers world wide come in at only about 5 mil­lion. The major­i­ty of those active mem­bers are in Utah and sur­round­ing regions. The out­look is dis­mal. Pseu­do claims like yours, Mel­drum’s, Wayne May’s, along with Fair­Mor­mon’s divi­sive claims of two Cumorahs and Meso­camer­i­can lim­it­ed geog­ra­phy do not help. In fact they hurt because ratio­nal, edu­cat­ed, think­ing indi­vid­u­als can quick­ly see that a hoax scrip­ture can only be propped up with more dis­tor­tions. This sit­u­a­tion is sad but true. When I final­ly real­ized that the Book of Mor­mon was not what I had been taught and that the things I had taught in LDS class­es through many years were not true or real, I was dev­as­tat­ed. It was one of the most dif­fi­cult things I ever had to face. David, if you want to help peo­ple, please stop dis­tort­ing sci­ence and archae­ol­o­gy. Please stop pre­sent­ing a fan­ta­sy inter­pre­ta­tion of science.

          1. Dave Mack
            Dave Mack

            Tapir

            Although the church is not grow­ing as fast as it use to its still grow­ing. In some areas of the world its grow­ing at an accel­er­at­ed pace. Some day whether in this life or the next you will come to real­ize truth­ful­ness of the Book of Mormon.

          2. tapirrider Avatar
            tapirrider

            David, I know that the Book of Mor­mon is not true. My death will not make a work of fic­tion real for me in some pre­tend “next” life. And with that knowl­edge I also know that claims about Amer­i­can Indi­ans based on the Book of Mor­mon are not only false, they are part of the racism that I now speak out against. Please stop putting that ridicu­lous label of Cau­casian onto some of the most beau­ti­ful peo­ple in the world who need to be seen and under­stood for who they real­ly are. Stop rob­bing Amer­i­can Indi­an’s con­tri­bu­tions to the world by try­ing to claim that their ances­tors were Cau­casians. Their real ances­tors deserve full cred­it, but your fan­ta­sy his­to­ry does­n’t grant that to them. Its time for me to end my com­mu­ni­ca­tion with you because quite hon­est­ly, your twists and dis­tor­tions of sci­ence, archae­ol­o­gy and Amer­i­can Indi­an cul­tures makes my head hurt. If you come to a point where you want to live in the real world, shoot me an email.

          3. molly_miller

            What does the Bible mean by ‘you are gods’ / ‘ye are gods’ in Psalm 82:6 and John 10:34?”

            Answer: Let’s start with a look at Psalm 82, the psalm that Jesus quotes in John 10:34. The Hebrew word trans­lat­ed “gods” in Psalm 82:6 is Elo­him. It usu­al­ly refers to the one true God, but it does have oth­er uses. Psalm 82:1 says, “God pre­sides in the great assem­bly; he gives judg­ment among the gods.” It is clear from the next three vers­es that the word “gods” refers to mag­is­trates, judges, and oth­er peo­ple who hold posi­tions of author­i­ty and rule. Call­ing a human mag­is­trate a “god” indi­cates three things: 1) he has author­i­ty over oth­er human beings, 2) the pow­er he wields as a civ­il author­i­ty is to be feared, and 3) he derives his pow­er and author­i­ty from God Him­self, who is pic­tured as judg­ing the whole earth in verse 8.

            This use of the word “gods” to refer to humans is rare, but it is found else­where in the Old Tes­ta­ment. For exam­ple, when God sent Moses to Pharaoh, He said, “See, I have made you like God to Pharaoh” (Exo­dus 7:1). This sim­ply means that Moses, as the mes­sen­ger of God, was speak­ing God’s words and would there­fore be God’s rep­re­sen­ta­tive to the king. The Hebrew word Elo­him is trans­lat­ed “judges” in Exo­dus 21:6 and 22:8, 9, and 28.

            The whole point of Psalm 82 is that earth­ly judges must act with impar­tial­i­ty and true jus­tice, because even judges must stand some­day before the Judge. Vers­es 6 and 7 warn human mag­is­trates that they, too, must be judged: “I said, ‘You are gods; you are all sons of the Most High.’ But you will die like mere men; you will fall like every oth­er ruler.” This pas­sage is say­ing that God has appoint­ed men to posi­tions of author­i­ty in which they are con­sid­ered as gods among the peo­ple. They are to remem­ber that, even though they are rep­re­sent­ing God in this world, they are mor­tal and must even­tu­al­ly give an account to God for how they used that authority.

            Now, let’s look at how Jesus uses this pas­sage. Jesus had just claimed to be the Son of God (John 10:25–30). The unbe­liev­ing Jews respond by charg­ing Jesus with blas­phe­my, since He claimed to be God (verse 33). Jesus then quotes Psalm 82:6, remind­ing the Jews that the Law refers to mere men—albeit men of author­i­ty and prestige—as “gods.” Jesus’ point is this: you charge me with blas­phe­my based on my use of the title “Son of God”; yet your own Scrip­tures apply the same term to mag­is­trates in gen­er­al. If those who hold a divine­ly appoint­ed office can be con­sid­ered “gods,” how much more can the One whom God has cho­sen and sent (vers­es 34–36)?

            In con­trast, we have the serpent’s lie to Eve in the Gar­den. His state­ment, “your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, know­ing good and evil” (Gen­e­sis 3:5), was a half-truth. Their eyes were opened (verse 7), but they did not become like God. In fact, they lost author­i­ty, rather than gain­ing it. Satan deceived Eve about her abil­i­ty to become like the one true God, and so led her into a lie. Jesus defend­ed His claim to be the Son of God on bib­li­cal and seman­tic grounds—there is a sense in which influ­en­tial men can be thought of as gods; there­fore, the Mes­si­ah can right­ly apply the term to Him­self. Human beings are not “gods” or “lit­tle gods.” We are not God. God is God, and we who know Christ are His children.

            Even James Tal­mage, a Mor­mon Apos­tle, said Psalm 82:6 is not about becom­ing gods.

            In Psalm 82:6, judges invest­ed by divine appoint­ment are called ‘gods.’ To this scrip­ture the Sav­ior referred in His reply to the Jews in Solomon’s Porch. Judges so autho­rized offi­ci­at­ed as the rep­re­sen­ta­tives of God and are hon­ored by the exalt­ed title ‘gods.’ Com­pare the sim­i­lar appel­la­tion applied to Moses (Exo. 4:16; 7:1). Jesus Christ pos­sessed divine autho­riza­tion, not through the word of God trans­mit­ted to Him by man, but as an inher­ent attribute. The incon­sis­ten­cy of call­ing human judges ‘gods,’ and of ascrib­ing blas­phe­my to the Christ who called Him­self the Son of God, would have been appar­ent to the Jews but for their sin-dark­ened minds.” (James Tal­mage, Jesus the Christ, p. 501). — Mor­mons often quote Psalm 82:6 which Jesus quot­ed in John 10:30–34 to show that we can become gods. Rather than them believ­ing the truth from a Chris­t­ian, per­haps they will believe it from their own apostle.

          4. molly_miller

            The Book of Mor­mon com­plete­ly con­tra­dicts Mormonismhttp://mmilly97.wordpress.com/

          5. Dave Mack
            Dave Mack

            Tapir
            Its sci­en­tist say­ing that Native Amer­i­can Hap­lo group x is Cau­casian you need to take that up with geneti­cist not me.

          6. Dave Mack
            Dave Mack

            Tapir
            No I think you should take it up with scientist.

            In that case, as it has been pro­posed, hap­logroup X was brought to Amer­i­ca by the east­ward migra­tion of an ances­tral white pop­u­la­tion, of which no trace has so far been found in the mtD­NA gene pool of mod­ern Siberian/eastern Asian population”
            (The Pres­ence of Mito­chon­dr­i­al Hap­logroup X in Alta­ians from South Siberia
            Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69:237–241, 2001)
            “To date, hap­logroup X has not been unam­bigu­ous­ly iden­ti­fied in Asia, rais­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty that some Native Amer­i­can founders were of Cau­casian ancestry.”
            http://​www​.sci​encedi​rect​.com/​s​c​i​e​nce/ar … 9707616292
            “Over­all, the sequence data and phy­lo­ge­net­ic analy­sis sug­gest that the Native Amer­i­can and the Euro­pean hap­logroup X mtD­NAs share a com­mon mater­nal ancestor”
            “The 14 Cau­casian-Euro­pean hap­logroup X sam­ples (des­ig­nat­ed “CE1”–“CE14”) includ­ed 2 Cau­casians of Euro­pean ancestry”
            (MtD­NA hap­logroup X: An Ancient Link between Europe/Western Asia and North America
            Michael D. Brown,1 Seyed H. Hosseini,1 Anto­nio Torroni,2 Hans-Ju¨rgenBandelt,3 Jon C. Allen,1 Theodore G. Schurr,1 Rosaria Scozzari,2 Ful­vio Cruciani,2 and Dou­glas C. Wallace1)
            “Phy­lo­ge­net­ic analy­sis and coa­les­cence esti­mates for Amer­i­can Indi­an and Euro­pean hap­logroup X mtD­NAs exclude the pos­si­bil­i­ty that the occur­rence of hap­logroup X in Amer­i­can Indi­ans is due to recent Euro­pean admixture.”
            (The Pres­ence of Mito­chon­dr­i­al hap­logroup X in Alta­ians from South Siberia
            Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69:237–241, 2001)

            A recent sur­vey of Euro­pean mtD­NA has demon­strat­ed the pres­ence of the same “oth­er” hap­lo­type motif in mod­ern Euro­pean pop­u­la­tions, in which it is called “Hap­logroup X.””
            (MtD­NA hap­logroup X: An Ancient Link between Europe/Western Asia and North America?)
            “To date, hap­logroup X has not been unam­bigu­ous­ly iden­ti­fied in Asia, rais­ing the pos­si­bil­i­ty that some Native Amer­i­can founders were of Cau­casian ancestry.”
            (MtD­NA hap­logroup X: An Ancient Link between Europe/Western Asia and North America?)
            Near­ly one-third of Native Amer­i­can genes come from west Eurasian peo­ples with ties to the Mid­dle East and Europe
            (Nation­al Geo­graph­ic “Great Surprise”—Native Amer­i­cans Have West Eurasian Origins”)
            On the basis of genet­ic analy­sis of some serum and red-cell pro­tein poly­mor­phisms, Sza­th­mary and Reed and Sza­th­mary et al. were able to reveal the pres­ence of “Cau­casian” alle­les in the south­east­ern Ojib­wa and to give an esti­mate of Cau­casian admix­ture of ‑30%; how­ev­er, more recent data on oth­er auto­so­mal locus poly­mor­phisms indi­cate that the genet­ic admix­ture may be as great as 50%.
            (mtD­NA and Y Chro­mo­some-Spe­cif­ic Poly­mor­phisms in Mod­ern Ojib­wa: Impli­ca­tions about the Ori­gin of Their Gene Pool)

          7. molly_miller

            The Book of Mor­mon isn’t hold­ing its own any­more though. Con­ver­sion rates are at an all time low, reten­tion of new con­verts is extreme­ly prob­lem­at­ic and even long time mem­bers from multi­gen­er­a­tional fam­i­lies are leav­ing. Esti­mates of active mem­bers world wide come in at only about 5 mil­lion. The major­i­ty of those active mem­bers are in Utah and sur­round­ing regions. The out­look is dis­mal. Pseu­do claims like yours, Mel­drum’s, Wayne May’s, along with Fair­Mor­mon’s divi­sive claims of two Cumorahs and Meso­camer­i­can lim­it­ed geog­ra­phy do not help. In fact they hurt because ratio­nal, edu­cat­ed, think­ing indi­vid­u­als can quick­ly see that a hoax scrip­ture can only be propped up with more dis­tor­tions. This sit­u­a­tion is sad but true. When I final­ly real­ized that the Book of Mor­mon was not what I had been taught and that the things I had taught in LDS class­es through many years were not true or real, I was dev­as­tat­ed. It was one of the most dif­fi­cult things I ever had to face. David, if you want to help peo­ple, please stop dis­tort­ing sci­ence and archae­ol­o­gy. Please stop pre­sent­ing a fan­ta­sy inter­pre­ta­tion of science.

          8. tapirrider Avatar
            tapirrider

            David, your use of the word Cau­casian is out­dat­ed and racist. Even worse, the con­text you use it in is that ancient white peo­ple in Amer­i­ca accom­plished the great­est things but were destroyed by non-Cau­casians. That theme is down­right racist, sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly false and moral­ly condemnable.

            The LDS church is mak­ing efforts to water down and remove the racism of skin col­or. White now means pure, not skin col­or as explained in the LDS essays and even in offi­cial cur­ricu­lum mate­ri­als. But here comes Dave, parad­ing out Cau­casian and claim­ing that hap­logroup x is a genet­ic mark­er for it, using it to iden­ti­fy white as a genet­ic dis­tinc­tive­ness as evi­dence for proof of the Book of Mor­mon. This garbage from Dave is sick and racist. And like all oth­ers who do this kind of thing, he resorts to the most extreme pseu­do claims such as ancient giants mix­ing with peo­ple, use of known hoax arti­facts and the con­cept that white is supe­ri­or. There real­ly is no place for this in the 21st cen­tu­ry and most impor­tant­ly, when address­ing mat­ters of Amer­i­can Indi­ans. This would­n’t stand for one minute if it was about Blacks, but when it comes to Amer­i­can Indi­ans, one of the real­i­ties of racism against them is that things like this are still con­sid­ered accept­able by the igno­rant and unin­formed and Dave just keeps right on doing it.

            Here are the sources Dave uses that refer to Hap­logroup x as Caucasian:

            This arti­cle is from 1997 and most­ly ref­er­ences old­er 1970s stud­ies that use the word Cau­casian, although one oth­er in the 1990s is also referenced
            mtD­NA and Y Chro­mo­some-Spe­cif­ic Poly­mor­phisms in Mod­ern Ojib­wa: Impli­ca­tions about the Ori­gin of Their Gene Pool
            http://​www​.ncbi​.nlm​.nih​.gov/​p​m​c​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​P​M​C​1​7​1​2​5​4​1​/​p​d​f​/​a​j​h​g​0​0​0​0​1​-​0​2​68.pdf

            Dave quotes from this one, but it does not use the word Cau­casian, although some foot­note sources refer to arti­cles from the 1970s that do
            The Pres­ence of Mito­chon­dr­i­al Hap­logroup X in Alta­ians from South Siberia
            http://​www​.ncbi​.nlm​.nih​.gov/​p​m​c​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​P​M​C​1​2​2​6​0​4​1​/​p​d​f​/​A​J​H​G​v​6​9​p​2​37.pdf

            Dave quotes from this one, which does use the word Cau­casian, dat­ed from 1998
            mtD­NA Hap­logroup X: An Ancient Link between Europe/Western Asia and North America?
            http://​www​.sci​encedi​rect​.com/​s​c​i​e​n​c​e​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​p​i​i​/​S​0​0​0​2​9​2​9​7​0​7​616292

            All of the above arti­cles using the word Cau­casian are in fact in a dif­fer­ent con­text that Dav­e’s use of it. The sci­en­tists are not claim­ing migra­tions to the Amer­i­c­as dur­ing time­lines of the Bible or Book of Mor­mon, they are acknowl­edg­ing the radio­car­bon dat­ing and mol­e­c­u­lar clock mea­sure­ments dat­ing back to the Pleis­tocene. This makes Dav­e’s use of it in the con­text of recent migra­tions even more racist.

            It is also impor­tant to real­ize that Dr. Chat­ters iden­ti­fied Ken­newick man as Cau­cosoid because of the skull shape, and he argued that Ken­newick man was not ances­tral to Amer­i­can Indi­ans. But Dr. Chat­ters changed his mind after study­ing an even more ancient skull in Mex­i­co, and this was before the final, con­clu­sive DNA stud­ies of Ken­newick man that direct­ly ties him to liv­ing Amer­i­can Indians.

            Here is some fur­ther read­ing on why the use of the word Cau­casian is inappropriate:

            http://​blogs​.dis​cov​er​magazine​.com/​g​n​x​p​/​2​0​1​1​/​0​1​/​s​t​o​p​-​u​s​i​n​g​-​t​h​e​-​w​o​r​d​-​c​a​u​c​a​s​i​a​n​-​t​o​-​m​e​a​n​-​w​h​i​t​e​/​#​.​V​5​D​H​Q​bgrLIU
            “While the old­er clas­si­cal phys­i­cal anthro­pol­o­gy terms like “Negroid” and “Cau­ca­soid” fell into dis­use after 1960, as you’d expect, “Cau­casian” went through a renais­sance in the 1990s.”

            http://​www​.nytimes​.com/​2​0​1​3​/​0​7​/​0​7​/​s​u​n​d​a​y​-​r​e​v​i​e​w​/​h​a​s​-​c​a​u​c​a​s​i​a​n​-​l​o​s​t​-​i​t​s​-​m​e​a​n​i​n​g​.​h​t​m​l?_r=0

            http://​www​.straight​.com/​b​l​o​g​r​a​/​5​2​6​5​2​6​/​f​i​v​e​-​r​e​a​s​o​n​s​-​w​h​y​-​w​e​-​s​h​o​u​l​d​-​s​t​o​p​-​c​a​l​l​i​n​g​-​w​h​i​t​e​-​p​e​o​p​l​e​-​c​a​u​casian

            Dave, I’m tak­ing this up with you because soci­ety has already tak­en it up with sci­en­tists and it is no longer con­sid­ered appro­pri­ate and is not found in cred­i­ble, cur­rent pub­li­ca­tions. You are the one doing it here and I’m try­ing to inform and edu­cate you on why this is wrong. Deflect­ing it back to old­er pub­li­ca­tions from sci­en­tists who no longer do this is not going to get you out of the hot seat.

          9. Dave Mack
            Dave Mack

            I will rephrase the work of sci­en­tist and geneti­cist so Tapir will not get offend­ed. Accord­ing to research by sci­en­tist and geneti­cist Native Amer­i­can Hap­lo group x a rare found­ing dna mark­er is a white dna mark­er. I think tapir will find that more palatable.

          10. molly_miller

            The worst sin­ners, accord­ing to Jesus, are not the har­lot­sand pub­li­cans, but the reli­gious lead­ers with their insis­tence on prop­er dres­sand groom­ing, their care­ful obser­vance of all the rules, their pre­cious con­cern­for sta­tus sym­bols, their strict legal­i­ty, their pious patriotism…the hair­cut­be­comes the test of virtue in a world where Satan deceives and rules byap­pear­ances.” Hugh Nib­ley Approach­ing Zion Vol 9

          11. tapirrider Avatar
            tapirrider

            David, it isn’t about me get­ting offend­ed or what I find palat­able. I gave you plen­ty of infor­ma­tion to read and explained how what you are doing is wrong. You don’t seem to get it so good­bye. I don’t have any more patience with your nonsense.

          12. Dave Mack
            Dave Mack

            Tapir

            I have enjoyed our dis­cus­sions I wish you the best

      3. Dave Mack
        Dave Mack

        Its a great quote by Hugh Nib­ley quot­ing the mas­ter. He could not be more right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

42
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x