North American Book of Mormon Geography by David McKane · 6 chapters
Chapter 3 of 6

Chapter Three

Tribe of Manasseh — Technology and Animals

Metallurgy

Hopewell gold, sil­ver, cop­per, and mete­oric iron arti­facts have been ver­i­fied by mod­ern day arche­ol­o­gist. List­ed below are pic­tures of con­firmed Hopewell arti­facts and accounts of ear­ly settlers.

“Ornate plates or sheets of cop­per (Fig­ure 7), as well as effi­gies, head­dress­es (Fig­ure 8), bracelets, and rings were found in the mound but not at the oth­er select­ed sites. Fig­ure 9 pro­vides an exam­ple of one of the orna­ments from the cop­per deposit in Mound 25. Even with­in the cat­e­go­ry of cop­per cutouts or sheets, great vari­ety was present in the spe­cif­ic shapes and forms. Ani­mals such as birds or fish were rep­re­sent­ed, as were geo­met­ric or oth­er more abstract forms, such as swastikas. How­ev­er, types such as celts, beads, bear teeth of cop­per, breast­plates, and but­tons were com­mon to oth­er sites. Moore­head (1922​:118) lists a cop­per awl as com­ing from Mound 25, but this awl is not list­ed in Gre­ber and Ruhl (1989) or Case and Carr (2008:Appendices 6.1A, 6.2).”

(In ref­er­ence to mound ruins)

“Besides, had the peo­ple who raised these works, been in pos­ses­sion of, and used ever so many tools, man­u­fac­tured from iron, by lying either on or under the earth, dur­ing all that long peri­od which has inter­vened between their authors and us, they would have long since oxy­dized by “rust­ing,” and left but faint traces of their exis­tence behind them.”
(Atwa­ter 1833 pg. 140)

(In ref­er­ence to Hopewell ruins)

“Gold and sil­ver orna­ments have been found in many of the tumuli (mounds) in Ohio. Sil­ver very well plat­ed, has been found in sev­er­al of the mounds : cop­per in many: pipe bowls of cop­per, ham­mered, and not weld­ed togeth­er, but lapped over, have been found in them.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 343)

Hopewell sil­ver ear­spools artifacts

Photograph of an excavated Hopewell repoussé copper bracelet artifact

Hopewell cop­per bracelet

Archaeological specimen of cold-hammered and annealed native copper sheets from a Hopewell mound

Smelting

Arche­ol­o­gist have not con­firmed smelt­ing by Hopewell Indi­ans they have only spec­u­lat­ed. Ear­ly set­tlers found ancient Indi­an fur­naces and iron swords and tools that could have only been made by smelt­ing. The Hopewell Mann site has giv­en anthro­pol­o­gist anoth­er look of ancient smelt­ing. The fur­naces that anthro­pol­o­gist have found are believed to have been tam­pered with. It is no doubt the Hopewell and Ade­na Indi­ans were excel­lent met­al smiths and used heat to manip­u­lat­ed met­al into tools and weapons.

“That may be answered in the last, and per­haps the most remark­able dis­cov­ery at Mann. Lin­der­man says sci­en­tists are start­ing tests on what appears to be evi­dence of lead smelt­ing. The prac­tice of melt­ing met­als at a very high tem­per­a­ture is just one of the many ques­tions archae­ol­o­gists will be confronting.”

(In ref­er­ence to Hopewell ruins)

“There appears to have been a row of fur­naces or smiths’ shops, where the cin­ders now lie many feet in depth. The remains are four or five feet in depth even now in many places.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 349)

Excavated tube of ancient iron slag from an Ohio Valley Adena archaeological site

Arling­ton Mallery exca­vat­ed a long tube of iron slag from an Ade­na site in the Ohio Valley.

Breastplate/Head Plate Artifacts

Today’s anthro­pol­o­gist have found cop­per breast Plates and head plates met­al jew­el­ry and knifes. Pic­tured below are Hopewell Indi­an breast­plates and dig that found 92 cop­per and Iron breast­plates found still posi­tioned on top of skeletons.

“Dis­cov­ered with a Skele­ton, near Fall Riv­er, Mass­a­chu­setts, in the year 1831. With this skele­ton were found a cor­rod­ed plate of brass, sup­posed to have con­sti­tut­ed a breast­plate.”
(Squier 1849)

Historical drawing of an engraved brass breastplate discovered with a skeleton near Fall River Massachusetts in 1831

Excavated Hopewell copper chest plate and freshwater pearl necklace artifacts

Breast plate with pearl necklace

Photograph of an ornate curved Hopewell copper headplate ornament

Hopewell Head plate artifact:

Hopewell copper ceremonial headplate with embossed antler effigies

In this dig 92 cop­per and iron breast plates with skele­tons were found as shown in the picture.

Archaeological excavation photograph of ancient skeletal remains interred with copper breastplates

Swords

The Book of Mor­mon men­tions swords. Swords were found in Indi­an Hopewell mounds by ear­ly Amer­i­can set­tlers. Mod­ern arche­ol­o­gy has not con­firmed the use of iron smelt­ing by Hopewell Indi­ans or swords; they have con­firmed woven cloth cop­per breast plates, mete­oric iron tools, cop­per and sil­ver jew­el­ry and cop­per tools. Why mod­ern day archae­ol­o­gy has not con­firmed iron swords can be explained by two things:

1. The descrip­tion of the iron swords are of an extreme state of oxi­da­tion. Some of the swords had noth­ing left but the han­dle and iron oxide left for the blade.

2. When some swords were found ear­ly set­tlers assumed it to be of Euro­pean man­u­fac­ture and not of the native abo­rig­ines. Most researchers believed that abo­rig­ines did not make iron tools. The Hopewell and Ade­na have proven they did make and use met­al tools and weapons. In these cas­es list­ed below many of the swords were found in graves of the mound builders.

Alma 44​:18

18 But behold, their naked skins and their bare heads were exposed to the sharp swords of the Nephites; yea, behold they were pierced and smit­ten, yea, and did fall exceed­ing­ly fast before the swords of the Nephites; and they began to be swept down, even as the sol­dier of Moroni had prophesied.

Mosi­ah 8​:11. In ref­er­ence to Jared­ite swords

11 And again, they have brought swords, the hilts there­of have per­ished, and the blades there­of were cankered with rust;

“In dig­ging the Louisville canal, nine­teen feet below the sur­face, with the coals of the last domes­tic fire upon them, medals of cop­per and sil­ver, swords and oth­er imple­ments of iron. Mr. Flint assures us that he has seen these strange ancient swords.”
(Conant, pg. 111, 1879)

(Items found in Hopewell Indi­an Ruins)

“A few miles from the town of Colum­bia, in Mau­ry coun­ty, in West Ten­nessee, and on Duck riv­er, are a num­ber of for­ti­fi­ca­tions, … also, sev­er­al frag­ments of earth­en ware, and a sword about two feet long, dif­fer­ing from any in use since the white peo­ple vis­it­ed the coun­try, appar­ent­ly once high­ly pol­ished, but now much eat­en with rust. Those who buried these arti­cles there, could fash­ion the sword, and could make bricks, and use them by the mason­ic art.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 179)

(The sword at this site was found in the state of New York by Smith­son­ian Researchers)

“Engrav­ings of the sil­ver-plat­ed discs and also of the embossed sil­ver plate sup-posed by Dr. Hil­dreth to have been a sword orna­ment, are here­with pre­sent­ed. These arti­cles have been crit­i­cal­ly exam­ined, and it is beyond doubt that the cop­per “boss­es” are absolute­ly plat­ed, not sim­ply over­laid, with sil­ver. Between the cop­per and the sil­ver exists a con­nec­tion, such as, it seems to me, could only be pro­duced by heat…. Again, if Dr. Hil­dreth is not mis­tak­en, oxy­dized iron, or steel, was also dis­cov­ered in con­nec­tion with the above remains ; from which also fol­lows, as a neces­si­ty upon the pre­vi­ous assump­tion, the extra­or­di­nary con­clu­sion that the mound-builders were acquaint­ed with the use of iron,”
(Squier, pg. 87)

(Items found in Hopewell Indi­an Ruins)

“On the back side, oppo­site the depressed por­tion, is a cop­per riv­et or nail, around which are two sep­a­rate plates, by which they were fas­tened to the leather. Two small pieces of the leather were found lying between the holes of one of the boss­es. They resem­ble the skin of an old mum­my. The plates of cop­per are near­ly reduced to rust. Around the riv­et of one of them is a quan­ti­ty of flax or hemp in a tol­er­a­ble state of preser­va­tion. Near the side of the human body was a plate of sil­ver, the upper part of a sword scab­bard, six inch­es long, two wide, weigh­ing one ounce. Three lon­gi­tu­di­nal ridges were on it, which per­haps cor­re­spond­ed with the edges or ridges of the sword.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 347)

(An iron sword was found in a North Car­oli­na mound. Due to this item Cryus Thomas who believed that the mounds were built after the Euro­peans arrived. We know the Hopewell mounds were built before Columbus)

“The iron imple­ments which are allud­ed to in the above-men­­­tioned arti­cles also in Sci­ence, as found in a North Car­oli­na mound. “
iron sword (3)
(Cyrus Thomas 1889 pg. 31)

(Items found in Hopewell Indi­an Ruins)

“The iron was con­sid­er­ably oxi­dat­ed, and when exposed to the air, dis­solved and fell into small par­ti­cles of rust, leav­ing only the han­dle, which was thick, and cen­tral parts adher­ing togeth­er. There were four or five of these swords, if we may so call them. The han­dle was round and cylin­dri­cal, and encir­cled with fer­ules or rings of sil­ver.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 328)

(Items found in Hopewell Indi­an Ruins)

“The abo­rig­ines had some very well man­u­fac­tured swords and knives of iron, and pos­si­bly of steel.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 349)

(Items found in Hopewell Indi­an Ruins)

“Where the mak­ers of bricks, swords and entrench­ments lived, and could not fail to have some sur­plus com­modi­ties to exchange for those for­eign coins.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 177)

Metal Plates

It’s a fact that Hopewell Indi­an made met­al sheets. There are tra­di­tion­al Indi­an accounts of met­al plate being used as records.

Hela­man 3​:13

13 And now there are many records kept of the pro­ceed­ings of this peo­ple, by many of this peo­ple, which are par­tic­u­lar and very large, con­cern­ing them.

(In ref­er­ence to Hopewell ruins)

“In Vir­ginia, near Wheel­ing on Grave creek, is a mound 75 feet high, with many small­er ones around it. In the inte­ri­or parts of this mound, are found human hones of large size, and mixed with them are two or three plates of brass, with char­ac­ters inscribed resem­bling let­ters.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 82)

(In ref­er­ence to Hopewell ruins)

“The shape of the two brass plates, — about a foot and a half in diam­e­ter. He said — he was told by his fore­fa­thers that those plates were giv­en to them by the man we call God; that there had been many more of oth­er shapes, some as long as he could stretch with both his arms, and some had writ­ing upon them which were buried with par­tic­u­lar men; and that they had instruc­tions giv­en with them, they must only be han­dled by par­tic­u­lar peo­ple, ….He said, none but this town’s peo­ple had any such plates giv­en them, and that they were a dif­fer­ent peo­ple from the Creeks. He only remem­bered three more, which were buried with three of his fam­i­ly, and he was the only man of the fam­i­ly now left. He said, there were two cop­per plates under the king’s cab­bin, which had lain there from the first set­tling of the town. This account was tak­en in the Tuc­­­ca­­­batchey-square, 27thJuly, 1759, per Will, Bolsover. “
(Adair 1775 pg. 178)

(In ref­er­ence to Hopewell ruins)

“In the inte­ri­or parts of this mound, are found human bones of large size, and mixed with them are two or three plates of brass, with char­ac­ters inscribed resem­bling let­ters. A mound near Chill­i­cothe being removed, dis­cov­ered near the bot­tom, in a cav­i­ty, the remains of some chief­tain.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 82)

(In ref­er­ence to Hopewell ruins)

“There are cer­tain enchant­ed beads, cer­tain thin plates of cop­per, of which extra­or­di­nary fig­ures are engraved, with inex­plic­a­ble words and unknown char­ac­ters.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 346)

“Accord­ing to Mor­gan, the Musco­gee prop­er, and per­haps also their incor­po­rat­ed tribes, have 22 clans. Of these the Wind appears to be the lead­ing one, pos­sess­ing priv­i­leges accord­ed to no oth­er clan, includ­ing the hered­i­tary guardian­ship of the ancient met­al tablets which con­sti­tute the pal­la­di­um of the tribe.” (Pal​la​di​um’s mean­ing in the 19thand 18thcen­tu­ry: for safe­ty)
(Mooney 1902 pg. 499)

“To sup­port their pre­ten­sions, this fam­i­ly hold in their pos­ses­sion a cir­cu­lar plate of vir­gin cop­per, on which is rude­ly marked inden­ta­tions and hiero­glyph­ics denot­ing the num­ber of gen­er­a­tions of the fam­i­ly who have passed away since they first pitched their lodges at Shaug-a-waum-ik-ong and took pos­ses­sion of the adja­cent coun­try, includ­ing the Island of La Pointe or Mo-ning­wun-a-kaun-ing… The old chief kept it care­ful­ly buried in the ground, and sel­dom dis­played it.”
(Williams, pg. 63)

“Above these is the arch of the heav­ens, with Roman numer­als and Ara­bic fig­ures scat­tered through and above it. The fig­ure eight is repeat­ed three times, the let­ter O repeat­ed sev­en times. With these famil­iar char­ac­ters are ethers which resem­ble let­ters of ancient alpha­bets, either Phoeni­cian or Hebrew.”
(Peet 1892, pg. 45)

Pic­tured below is a tablet of unknown char­ac­ters from Stephen D Peet’s book The Mound Builders Their Work and Relics.

Carved prehistoric stone tablet from a Hopewell mound featuring curvilinear geometric patterns

Metal Bow

Nephi had a steel bow. Some of the swords found be ear­ly set­tlers were believed to be iron or steel. Here is an ear­ly account of find­ing a steel bow.

“I have been told by an eye wit­ness, that a few years ago, near Blacks­burgh in Vir­ginia, eighty miles from Mari­et­ta, there was found about half of a steel bow, which, when entire, would mea­sure five or six feet; the oth­er part was cor­rod­ed or bro­ken. The father of the man who found it was a black­smith, and worked up this curi­ous arti­cle, I sup­pose, with as lit­tle remorse as he would an old gun-bar­rel. Mounds are very fre­quent in that neigh­bour­hood, and many curi­ous arti­cles of Antiq­ui­ty have been found there.”
(Atwa­ter 1833, pg. 176)

“A few years ago, near Blacks­burg in Vir­ginia, 8 (5 miles from Mari­et­ta, was found about the half of a steel bow, which when entire would have mea­sured five or six feet.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 349)

Coins

Arche­ol­o­gist have not found coins yet but I believe that set­tlers went through the mounds and areas and picked up items of val­ue as did John Hay­wood and oth­ers. For the most part, I believe that any unknown or strange coins found by set­tlers or his­to­ri­ans would not have been attrib­uted to Native Amer­i­can manufacture.

Hay­wood and Atwa­ter found coins in Hopewell Indi­an mounds. Hay­wood believed the mound builders trad­ed their swords and met­al work with Romans dur­ing ancient times receiv­ing in their place Roman coins.

(Con­cern­ing Hopewell Indi­an artifacts)

“Rea­son­able to con­clude that a civ­i­lized race of men once lived on Elk and Duck rivers, who car­ried on com­merce, used coined mon­ey, and forged iron into tools. And, more­over, had inter­course with nations who had at least com­mer­cial con­nex­ions, medi­ate­ly or imme­di­ate­ly, with the Roman Empire.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 177)

“Where the mak­ers of bricks, swords and entrench­ments lived, and could not fail to have some sur­plus com­modi­ties to exchange for those for­eign coins.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 177)

“Of all the Roman coins that have been found in Ten­nessee and Ken­tucky, the ear­li­est bears date in the time of Anton­i­nus, the next in the time of Com­modus.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 183)

“First. On the farm of Mr. Edward Payne, near Lex­ing­ton, were found two ancient coins; one was of gold, and sold for 13 dol­lars: the oth­er was of brass. Each had a head reversed, and both were inscribed with char­ac­ters not under­stood, but said to resem­ble Hebrew. The date of the gold coin was prob­a­bly 1214, and the date of the brass piece 1009.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 343)

“Sev­er­al Roman coins, said to have been found in. a cave near Nashville, in Ten­nessee, bear­ing date not many cen­turies after the Chris­t­ian era, have excit­ed some inter­est among Anti­quar­i­ans.”
(Atwa­ter 1833, pg. 119)

“In Har­ri­son Coun­ty, I have been cred­i­bly informed, that sev­er­al coins were found, near an ancient work.”
(Atwa­ter 1833, pg. 118)

“When to these are added the con­sid­er­a­tions insep­a­ra­ble from oth­er like instances, in the neigh­bour­hood of Ten­nessee, where strange coins have been found, some with super­scrip­tions in unknown char­ac­ters.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 178)

“Mr. Spear found under the roots of a beech tree which had been blown up, two pieces of cop­per coin, of the size of our old cop­per pence. On one side was rep­re­sent­ed an eagle, with three heads unit­ed to one neck.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 179)

“At Cir­cleville a cop­per coin was tak­en from the cen­tral mound, from beneath the roots of a hick­o­ry grow­ing on the mound, sev­en or eight inch­es in cir­cum­fer­ence. It has no resem­blance in its devices to any British or oth­er coins to which it hath been com­pared.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 342)

“Above Hills­bor­ough in North Car­oli­na, and near the remains of a town which had been desert­ed in very remote times, was picked up, about the year 1805 or 1804, a round piece of cop­per about the size of an Amer­i­can eagle. On both sides was a short line of let­ters, with par­al­lel lines increas­ing in length till past the cen­ter, whence they decreased in length to the bot­tom, accom­mo­dat­ing them­selves to the round­ed shape of the cop­per. It was neat­ly exe­cut­ed. The let­ters were of some unknown alpha­bet. This cop­per was dropped again on the same plan­ta­tion, where prob­a­bly it now is.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 343)

Mound Fortifications

Hopewell/Nephite Indi­ans built mound for­ti­fi­ca­tions as a defense against invad­ing Indi­an tribes. The Hopewell civ­i­liza­tions match­es the Book of Mor­mon not only because of the time­line, but because of earth­en mounds around alltheir cities, as stat­ed in Alma 50​:1.

Alma 50​:1

1And now it came to pass that Moroni did not stop mak­ing prepa­ra­tions for war, or to defend his peo­ple against the Laman­ites; for he caused that his armies should com­mence in the com­mence­ment of the twen­ti­eth year of the reign of the judges, that they should com­mence in dig­ging up heaps of earth round about all the cities, through­out all the land which was pos­sessed by the Nephites.

Alma 49​:4

4But behold, how great was their dis­ap­point­ment; for behold, the Nephites had dug up a ridge of earth round about them, which was so high that the Laman­ites could not cast their stones and their arrows at them that they might take effect, nei­ther could they come upon them save it was by their place of entrance.

Alma 50:2–4

2 And upon the top of these ridges of earth he caused that there should be tim­bers, yea, works of tim­bers built up to the height of a man, round about the cities.

3 And he caused that upon those works of tim­bers there should be a frame of pick­ets built upon the tim­bers round about; and they were strong and high.

4 And he caused tow­ers to be erect­ed that over­looked those works of pick­ets, and he caused places of secu­ri­ty to be built upon those tow­ers, that the stones and the arrows of the Laman­ites could not hurt them.

Description of the Hopewell Pollock Stockade

“It con­sists of a series of earth­en embank­ments rang­ing from three to ten feet in height that par­tial­ly enclose a large, 120-acre, plateau locat­ed along Massie Creek.

“Robert Rior­dan, an archae­ol­o­gist with Wright State Uni­ver­si­ty, has direct­ed many sea­sons of exca­va­tions at the Pol­lock Works reveal­ing a com­pli­cat­ed site his­to­ry. The works appear to have been con­struct­ed in five major stages begin­ning as ear­ly as AD 50. One of these stages involved the erec­tion of a large, tim­ber stock­ade along the top of the earth­en embankments.”

When Squier described this site he said with a sim­ple stock­ade this site would be impreg­nable. He did not know but archae­o­log­i­cal exca­va­tion showed that at one time the Pol­lock Works did have a tim­ber stockade.

I could not find a recon­struc­tion of Hopewell Indi­an stock­ade but did find a recon­struct­ed stock­ade at Angel Mounds. The stock­ade show below dates past the Book of Mor­mon and Hopewell time­line to 1100AD-1450AD. I can only assume the build­ing of defen­sive struc­tures con­tin­ued to be built by the Laman­ites until the prac­tice of build­ing fortress­es even­tu­al­ly died out altogether:

Photograph of the Angel Mounds prehistoric Mississippian earthwork complex in Indiana

Angel Mound

“Archae­o­log­i­cal exca­va­tion revealed that the town was sur­round­ed by a stock­ade, with the Ohio Riv­er act­ing as a bar­ri­er on the south side. A gate­way was placed to the east, about a fourth of the way around from where the east­ern flank of the stock­ade meets the riv­er. A sec­ond bar­ri­er, a type of pick­et fence, was set 14 feet (4.3 m) out­side the stock­ade. It was designed to slow the attack­ers as they came into range.

In 1972 the park recon­struct­ed part of the stock­ade, based on archae­o­log­i­cal evi­dence. It stands 12′ high and is made of wood­en posts set 4 feet deep into a nar­row trench. The posts are cov­ered with wat­tle and daub, a loose weav­ing of sticks cov­ered with a mud-and-grass plas­ter. The defen­sive bas­tions were also recon­struct­ed, which had been built every 10 to 11 feet (3.4 m) and pro­ject­ed 11 to 12 feet (3.7 m) from the wall. The orig­i­nal peo­ple planned the bas­tions at dis­tances which defend­ers could cov­er with arrows or lances, thus pro­tect­ing the walls from a direct attack.”

“From one of these to anoth­er is about two arrow­shot; so that the archers in the tow­ers would be able to defend the whole dis­tance of the wall between them; while those in front could ward off the assailants at the pas­sage”
(Thad­deus Mason Har­ris, The Jour­nal of a tour into the Ter­ri­to­ry North­west of the Alleghany Moun­tain; 1805)

“Col. M. asked him if he could not tell who made those old forts, which dis­played so much skill in for­ti­fy­ing. He answered that he did not know, but that a sto­ry had been hand­ed down from a very long ago peo­ple, that there had been a nation of white peo­ple inhab­it­ing the coun­try who made the graves and forts.”
(M​.​H. Frost 1819; On the abo­rig­ines of the West­ern Countries)

“John Cushen, an Indi­an of truth and respectabil­i­ty, hav­ing point­ed to the large mound in the town of Chill­i­cothe, observed to a gen­tle­man that it was a great curios­i­ty. To this the gen­tle­man accord­ed, and said, The Indi­ans built that. No, said he, it was made by white folks, for Indi­ans nev­er make forts or mounds — this coun­try was inhab­it­ed by white peo­ple once.”
(M​.​H. Frost 1819; On the abo­rig­ines of the West­ern Countries)

Concerning Hopewell Indian Mounds

“In one of the plates of Lapiteau’s work, there is a rep­re­sen­ta­tion of an attack on an Indi­an fort, which is evi­dent­ly con­struct­ed upon one of the mounds: its form is cir­cu­lar, the enclo­sure of large pick­ets and heavy beams on the out­side, extend­ing to the ground on which the mound stands. Those inside defend them­selves with stones, arrows, &c. while the assailants are either aim­ing their arrows at such as appear above the wall.”
(Brack­en­ridge 1811 pg. 185)

“The care which is every­where vis­i­ble, about these ruins, to pro­tect every part from a foe with­out; the high plain on which they are sit­u­at­ed, which is gen­er­al­ly forty feet above the coun­try around it; …they speak vol­umes in favour of the sagac­i­ty of their authors”
(Atwa­ter 1833 pg. 130)

“Imlay, in his fan­ci­ful descrip­tion of Ken­tucky, asserts that the Indi­ans were not acquaint­ed with the use of for­ti­fi­ca­tions.”
(Brack­en­ridge 1811 pg. 183)

Alma 48​:8

8 Yea, he had been strength­en­ing the armies of the Nephites, and erect­ing small forts, or places of resort; throw­ing up banks of earth round about to enclose his armies, and also build­ing walls of stone to encir­cle them about, round about their cities and the bor­ders of their lands; yea, all round about the land.

“Could bricks be of any use to the ancient inhab­i­tants, with­out the trow­el and the mason­ic art, not to men­tion the build­ing of stone walls?”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 189)

Mass Burial Pits and Battlegrounds

Two thirds of the Book of Mor­mon is about wars between the Laman­ites and Nephites. Large bone pits and piles were found in the state of New York and oth­er states. These large bone pits are sup­port­ive evi­dence of the bat­tles that took place between Nephites and Lamanites.

In the last bat­tles Mor­mon states that bod­ies of the Nephites were heaped into piles (Mor­mon 2​:15).

New York State:

“It was called the “Bone Fort,” from the cir­cum­stance that the ear­ly set­tlers found with­in it a mound, six feet in height by thir­ty at the base, which was entire­ly made up of human bones slight­ly cov­ered with earth… The pop­u­lar opin­ion con­cern­ing this accu­mu­la­tion is, that it con­tained the bones of the slain, thus heaped togeth­er after some severe bat­tle.”
(Squier 1849)

Ken­tucky:

“Half a mile from this place, at the foot of the moun­tain, in a large cave full of human bones, per­haps sev­er­al wag­on loads; some of which are small, and oth­ers very large”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 153)

New York State:

“The bones were of indi­vid­u­als of both sex­es and of all ages. Among them were a few fetal bones. Many of the skulls bore marks of vio­lence, lead­ing to the belief that they were bro­ken before bur­ial.”
(Squier 1849)

Illi­nois:

“Mr. Ramey, the own­er of the mound, speaks about dig­ging in one part of the field and find­ing heaps of bones eight feet deep, and says that the bones are every­where present.”
(Peet 1892 pg. 163)

New York State:

“Human bones have been dis­cov­ered beneath the leaves; and in near­ly every part of the trench skele­tons of adults of both sex­es, of chil­dren, and infants, have been found, cov­ered only by the veg­etable accu­mu­la­tions. They seem to have been thrown togeth­er promis­cu­ous­ly.”
(Squier 1849)

New York State:

“Among them may be men­tioned the “bone-pits,” or deposits of human bones. One is found near the vil­lage of Brownsville, on Black Riv­er. It is described as a pit, ten or twelve feet square, by per­haps four feet deep, in which are promis­cu­ous­ly heaped togeth­er a large num­ber of human skele­tons.”
(Squier 1849)

Cloth and Fine Twined Linen

Anthro­pol­o­gist arche­o­log­i­cal digs have shown that Hopewell Indi­ans made their own woven cloth.

Hela­man 6​:13

13 Behold their women did toil and spin, and did make all man­ner of cloth, of fine-twined linen and cloth of every kind, to clothe their nakedness.

“The relics which are most numer­ous are spear-heads, arrow-heads, … nee­dles, and occa­sion­al­ly spec­i­mens of woven fiber, which might have formed the cloth­ing for a rude peo­ple, and a few spec­i­mens of the high­er works of art”
(Peet 1892 pg. 25)

Below is an arti­fact of Hopewell/Nephite cloth:

Remains of oxidized iron implement blade unearthed from an Ohio burial mound

More Hopewell Cloth Artifacts:

Photographs of heavily rusted iron axe and celt blades recovered from mound excavations

http://​app​s​.ohio​his​to​ry​.org/​o​h​i​o​a​r​c​h​a​e​o​l​o​g​y​/​t​o​p​—​t​e​n​—​m​a​s​t​e​r​p​i​e​c​e​s​—​o​f​—​t​h​e​—​h​o​p​e​w​e​l​l​—​c​u​l​t​u​r​e​—​r​e​v​ealed/

Item (A) Hopewell Neck­lace and (B) Hopewell Buttons:

Corroded prehistoric iron and copper tool fragments displayed in a museum collection

Woven Cloth Worn as Clothing

Hopewell Indi­an use of woven cloth match­es the Book of Mor­mon descrip­tion of Nephites wear­ing woven cloth­ing and in some instances it being described as a sta­tus symbol.

4 Nephi 1​:24

24 And now, in this two hun­dred and first year there began to be among them those who were lift­ed up in pride, such as the wear­ing of cost­ly appar­el, and all man­ner of fine pearls, and of the fine things of the world.

“Skele­ton 248 had been dressed in a skirt of fine­ly woven cloth extend­ing from the waist to the knees, to which had been sewn pearls, bears-teeth, and oth­er orna­ments.”
(Moore­head 1922 pg. 169)

“Unar­guable Mis­sis­sip­pi­an peri­od rep­re­sen­ta­tions of gar­ments do exist, and these make cred­i­ble the inter­pre­ta­tion of the bur­ial 103 fab­ric as a pos­si­ble gar­ment. For exam­ple, Phillips and Brown (1978: Plate 20) illus­trate frag­ments of a Spiro engraved shell cup that depicts male human fig­ures wear­ing tunics that cov­er one shoul­der and a por­tion of the chest. One of a group of six human fig­ures engraved on the Rocky Creek lime­stone slab (Park­er 1949:Figure 2) is shown wear­ing a cloak-like gar­ment that cov­ers the shoul­ders, one arm, all but the low­er part of the oth­er arm, and the entire tor­so.”
(A Most Indis­pens­able Art: Native Fiber Indus­tries from East­ern North Amer­i­ca, by James B. Petersen)

“Equiv­o­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tions of gar­ments over the upper body include two almost iden­ti­cal shell gor­gets from Mound C at Etowah, one of which came from the 1884 BAE exca­va­tions (Thomas 1894:Figure 190), and the oth­er (unpub­lished) from bur­ial 19 exca­vat­ed in 1954 by Lar­son. The dual human fig­ures have the upper body and arms cov­ered with par­al­lel lines that may rep­re­sent a gar­ment…”
(A Most Indis­pens­able Art: Native Fiber Indus­tries from East­ern North Amer­i­ca, by James B. Petersen)

“The elite nature of the fab­ric evi­dence and the bur­ial con­text war­rants such in infer­ence here. Mound C appar­ent­ly sup­port­ed a mor­tu­ary tem­ple which, in turn served as the focus of an elab­o­rate com­plex of funer­ary rit­u­als asso­ci­at­ed with a high sta­tus social group at Etowah.”
(Lar­son 1971)

Extensive Trade System and Zelph

In May and June 1834 Joseph Smith led a Mor­mon group (a para­mil­i­tary expe­di­tion known as Zion’s Camp) on a march from Kirt­land, Ohio to Jack­son Coun­ty, Mis­souri. On June 3, while pass­ing through west-cen­­­tral Illi­nois near Grig­gsville, some bones were unearthed from a mound. These bones were iden­ti­fied by Smith as belong­ing to a Laman­ite chief­­­tain-war­ri­or named Zelph. The mound in ques­tion is now known as Naples-Rus­sell Mound 8.

“At about one foot deep we dis­cov­ered the skele­ton of a man, almost entire; and between two of his ribs we found an Indi­an arrow, which had evi­dent­ly been the cause of his death. Sub­se­quent­ly the visions of the past being opened to my under­stand­ing by the Spir­it of the Almighty, I dis­cov­ered that the per­son whose skele­ton was before us was a white Laman­ite, a large, thick­set man, and a man of God. His name was Zelph. He was a war­rior and chief­tain under the great prophet Onanda­gus, who was known from the Hill Cumorah, or east­ern sea to the Rocky Moun­tains.” The Hopewell Indi­ans made high­ways and had an advanced trade sys­tem that extend­ed to the Rocky Moun­tains. Joseph Smith vision of Zelph match­es the exten­sive trade of the Hopewell Indians.

The Prophet Onanda­gus is not men­tioned in the Book of Mor­mon, but he could have ties to the Ononda­ga Tribe whose tra­di­tion­al lands are in the state of New York.

Animals

Horses, Chariots, Highways, and Trade

The Book of Mor­mon men­tions hors­es and char­i­ots. Anthro­pol­o­gist state that North Amer­i­can hors­es went extinct around 11000 BC. Horse bones dat­ing to 7000 BC were found lat­er. To know exact­ly when each horse, ele­phant, and cow went extinct has to be an unsure sci­ence. Inter­est­ing­ly, once again it is believed that the Clo­vis peo­ple (who I believe are the same Nephite/Lamanite peo­ples men­tioned in the Book of Mor­mon) who caused this extinction.

The Hopewell/Nephites had advanced high­way trade. The Great Hopewell Road a road made by the Hopewell is 60 miles long from Newark to Chill­i­cothe. Hopewell trade stretched to the Rocky Moun­tains to the Gulf of Mex­i­co. This is known because obsid­i­an Hopewell arti­facts in plen­ti­ful sup­ply are from the Rocky Moun­tains from New Mex­i­co to Mon­tana. It might have also stretched to Cen­tral and South Amer­i­ca. Jaguar teeth and slant­ed eye fig­urines more com­mon to cen­tral and South Amer­i­ca by the Mayans were found at the Mann Hopewell site in Indiana.

The ques­tions becomes: did the Hopewell trav­el thou­sands miles to the Gulf Coast and to the Rocky Moun­tains and beyond car­ry­ing sup­plies and com­modi­ties by hand and foot? I would con­tend it was by horse and char­i­ot. It seems implau­si­ble that their exten­sive and advanced trade sys­tem could be main­tained with­out horse and chariot.

Just like Nephi brought over met­al­lur­gy, breast­plates, swords, coins, and cloth tech­nol­o­gy, why not also the use of hors­es and chariots?

It is a known fact that man had inter­ac­tion with hors­es. Pre-Columbian Clo­vis spear points were found in Col­orado that had horse pro­tein on the spear point.
http://​www​.aca​d​e​mi​c​room​.com/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​/​i​d​e​n​t​i​f​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​—​h​o​r​s​e​—​e​x​p​l​o​i​t​a​t​i​o​n​—​c​l​o​v​i​s​—​h​u​n​t​e​r​s​—​b​a​s​e​d​—​p​r​o​t​e​i​n​—​a​n​alysis
https://​en​.​m​.wikipedia​.org/wiki​/Clovis_spear_points

(In ref­er­ence to a pet­ro­glyph found in Massachusetts)

“In anoth­er scene, there is a ves­sel, with its masts, flags, and long rud­der, as in the ori­en­tal ves­sels at this day. There is the fig­ure of a horse, which is the well-known sym­bol of Carthage.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 329)

Elephants/Mammoths

The Book of Mor­mon men­tions ele­phants. There is both arche­o­log­i­cal evi­dence of human inter­ac­tions of Mam­moths and Indi­an leg­end of Mam­moths. When Hay­wood was going through the mounds in his area he assumed that the Indi­ans were rais­ing mam­moths because mam­moth bones were found among human bones. They also found Indi­an pipes in the shape of elephants.

In one Iro­quois leg­end about a large beast that caused hav­oc in a vil­lage. David Cusick attrib­ut­es this beast to being a mastodon.

Man hunt­ing mam­moths has been con­firmed by arche­ol­o­gist. It is believed by some sci­en­tist that human hunt­ing caused the Mam­moth to become extinct.

“The Naco Mam­moth Kill Site is an archae­o­log­i­cal site in south­east Ari­zona, near Naco, Ari­zona. The site was report­ed to the Ari­zona State Muse­um in Sep­tem­ber 1951 by Marc Navar­rete, a local res­i­dent, after his father found two Clo­vis points in Green­bush Draw, while dig­ging out the fos­sil bones of a mam­moth. Emil Hau­ry exca­vat­ed the Naco mam­moth site in April 1952. In only five days, Hau­ry recov­ered the remains of a Columbian Mam­moth that had been killed by the use of at least 8 Clo­vis points…“

(Con­cern­ing items found in a Hopewell mound)

“The fourth dis­cov­ery con­sist­ed of a carved stone pipe, also in the shape of an ele­phant or mastodon.”
(Peet 1892 pg. 163)

Ele­phant pipe depic­tions are from The Mound Builders Their Work and Relics by Stephen D Peet PhD.

Archaeological sketch of ancient native copper tools, awls, and celts recovered from an Adena mound

Photographic display of an excavated prehistoric Hopewell necklace composed of native copper beads and marine shells

“The lat­ter (neck­lace) may have been pro­duced in Amer­i­ca, but the ivory beads most prob­a­bly came from India; or the coun­try in its vicin­i­ty, where the ele­phant is raised, and the ivory worked.”
(Hay­wood 1823, pg. 82)

“At the time they found the grave above men­tioned, they also found oth­er graves, and small pieces of decayed human bones, and bones of ani­mals, amongst which was the jaw bone with the tusk attached to it, of some unknown ani­mal. The jaw bone is about a foot long, hav­ing at the extrem­i­ty a tusk one inch and a half in length. The tusk is in the same form as that of Cuvier’s mastodon, but has more cur­va­ture.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 126)

Cattle

Book of Mor­mon men­tions cat­tle which is a crit­i­cism for the Book of Mor­mon say­ing there is no proof. It’s a known fact that three species of cat­tle (Bison lat­ifrons, Ovi­bos cav­ifrons, Bison antiqu­us,) roamed what is now Hopewell Indi­an lands. It’s believed that the Clo­vis peo­ple once again caused the extinc­tion of these ani­mals. Any ani­mals that became extinct by the Clo­vis peo­ple will be attrib­uted to the Nephites in this essay. The gen­er­al­ly accept­ed the­o­ry of the Clo­vis spear point does not match up with the Book of Mor­mon ‚but as I stat­ed pre­vi­ous­ly, the cur­rent the­o­ries of the Clo­vis peo­ple are put into ques­tion with the giv­en arche­o­log­i­cal, lin­guis­tic, cul­tur­al and DNA evidence.

“But spec­i­mens (Ovi­bos cav­ifrons) of this species have been exca­vat­ed in Louisiana, Mis­sis­sip­pi, Ten­nessee, and Vir­ginia; sug­gest­ing the south­ern lim­its of its range prob­a­bly extend­ed into the Geor­gia piedmont.”

https://​markgel​bart​.word​press​.com/​2​0​1​0​/​0​6​/​1​1​/​w​e​r​e​—​t​h​e​r​e​—​t​h​r​e​e​—​s​p​e​c​i​e​s​—​o​f​—​b​o​v​i​n​e​—​r​o​a​m​i​n​g​—​s​o​u​t​h​e​a​s​t​e​r​n​—​n​o​r​t​h​—​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​—​d​u​r​i​n​g​—​t​h​e​—​l​a​t​e​—​p​l​e​i​s​t​ocene/

Goats

An indige­nous species of goat the Har­ing­ton goat lived on the Amer­i­can con­ti­nent but went extinct with the oth­er 25 ani­mals. I believe that the Clo­vis peo­ple (Nephites and Laman­ites) caused its extinction.

Below is a Hopewell goat horn cop­per arti­fact.
Hopewell copper effigy crafted into the curved shape of a wild goat or ram horn

Sheep

Sheep are men­tioned by the Jared­ites but the Nephites only men­tion sheep in para­ble. I believe the Jared­ites brought over sheep but dur­ing times of famine as stat­ed in the Book of Ether there sheep became extinct (Ether 10​:1, Ether 11​:7). In the book of Enos chap­ter 2​:21 it men­tions types of ani­mal the Nephites raised and flocks that they had. It men­tions that they had flocks of all man­ner of cat­tle but sheep is not mentioned.

21 And it came to pass that the peo­ple of Nephi did till the land, and raise all man­ner of grain, and of fruit, and flocks of herds, and flocks of all man­ner of cat­tle of every kind, and goats, and wild goats, and also many horses.

The only time the Nephites men­tion sheep is in para­ble. Because of this I’m going to assume that the men­tion of flocks by the Nephites is in ref­er­ence only to cat­tle, goats and horses.

Bees

Book of Mor­mon men­tions bees but bees as of this point are not found in Amer­i­ca pre-Colum­bus. The Book of Mor­mon states that the Jared­ites col­lect­ed bees then brought them on their ship and sailed to Amer­i­ca. Since bees and hon­ey are nev­er men­tioned by the Jared­ites or Nephites while in the land of promise I’m assum­ing the bees did not sur­vive the voyage.

Cureloms and Cumoms

Cureloms and Cumoms are two types of ani­mals men­tioned in the Book of Mor­mon by the Jared­ites that they con­sid­ered use­ful. It’s believed the Clo­vis peo­ple caused 25 dif­fer­ent ani­mals to go extinct one can pick and choose from this list which ani­mal best fits this descrip­tion. It could be a camel indige­nous to North Amer­i­ca or a ground sloth the size of a bear. Both of these ani­mal went extinct at the same time as the cat­tle and Har­ing­ton goat and cameloid pro­tein has been found Clo­vis spear points. Once again I believe the dat­ing of when every sin­gle ani­mal of a par­tic­u­lar species went extinct and is incorrect.

https://​en​.wikipedi​a​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​L​i​s​t​_​o​f​_​N​o​r​t​h​_​A​m​e​r​i​c​a​n​_​a​n​i​m​a​l​s​_​e​x​t​i​n​c​t​_​i​n​_​t​h​e​_​H​o​locene

Ether 9​:19

19 And they also had hors­es, and ass­es, and there were ele­phants and cureloms and cumoms; all of which were use­ful unto man, and more espe­cial­ly the ele­phants and cureloms and cumoms.

Barley and Wheat in Hopewell Agriculture

Hopewell Indi­ans were agri­cul­tur­al­ist and grew lit­tle bar­ley and may grass in my opin­ion accept­able sub­sti­tu­tions for the men­tion of bar­ley and wheat grown by the Nephites – May grass and wheat are both types of grass seed

Unknown Characters and Language

Mor­mon 9​:34 – But the Lord knoweth the things which we have writ­ten, and also that none oth­er peo­ple knoweth our lan­guage; and because that none oth­er peo­ple knoweth our language…

I believe that hap­logroup X or the Nephites brought over a dis­tinct lan­guage and cul­ture. There is evi­dence that the Great Lake Indi­ans have a unique and dif­fer­ent lan­guage from sur­round­ing tribes.

(Gaspesian/Micmac Indi­ans Pro­posed Nephite/ Hopewell survivors)

“The Gaspe­sian lan­guage has noth­ing at all in com­mon, in its expres­sions, any more than in the mean­ing of its words, with the lan­guages of our Europe ….because, amidst an infin­i­ty of dif­fer­ent tongues which pre­vail among all these peo­ples, our Gaspe­sians are dis­tin­guished from the Mon­tag­niez, Soquo­qui, Aben­naqui, Hurons, Algo­mquins, Iro­quois, and oth­er nations of this new world, by a lan­guage which is pecu­liar to them.”
(Cler­cq 1680 pg. 141)

(The area men­tioned in the quote cor­re­sponds with the Gaspesian/Micmac Indi­ans lands the pro­posed Hopewell/ Nephites survivors)

“A very respectable Amer­i­can author has imag­ined, that the Indi­an tribes to the north­ward of the riv­er Saco spake a lan­guage very dif­fer­ent from that of the tribes to the south­ward of the famed riv­er. He informs us, that ”there was not one word” of the lan­guage of the tribes of Penob­scot and St. John’s, who dwell to the north­ward of the Saco.”
(Bar­ton pg. LVIII)

“Let­ters of an unknown alpha­bet are inscribed upon a rock in the west­ern parts of New-York. There is a rock, called the Dighton rock, on Taunton Riv­er, near Dighton, in Mass­a­chu­setts. It is a large rock in the mar­gin of the sea, and upon it are inscrip­tions in strange char­ac­ters, part­ly alpha­bet­i­cal and part­ly hiero­glyph­ic.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 329)

“There are cer­tain enchant­ed beads, thin plates of cop­per, of which extra­or­di­nary fig­ures are engraved, with inex­plic­a­ble words and unknown characters.”

(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 346)

A Lost Book/Gospel

(Con­cern­ing Hat­tera Indi­ans of North Carolina)

“These (Hat­tera Indi­ans) tell us, that sev­er­al of their Ances­tors were white Peo­ple, and could talk in a Book, as we do; the Truth of which is con­firmed by gray eyes being found fre­quent­ly amongst these Indi­ans, and no oth­ers”
(John Law­son 1709 pg. 62)

(About Gaspesian/Micmac Indians)

“They hold, fur­ther, that it could well have been a fact that these indi­vid­u­als were instruct­ed in the sacred mys­ter­ies of our holy Reli­gion, and that they had even a knowl­edge and the use of let­ters, since, in the estab­lish­ment of colonies, it is cus­tom­ary to send there men who are alike learned and pious, in order that they may teach to the peo­ples, along with pure­ly human knowl­edge, the most sol­id max­ims of Chris­t­ian wis­dom and piety. Nobody, how­ev­er, hav­ing fol­lowed them in these glo­ri­ous employ­ments, the knowl­edge which they had of the true God, of let­ters, and of their ori­gin, was thus grad­u­al­ly lost and effaced from the minds of their unfor­tu­nate pos­ter­i­ty by the lapse of time.”
(Cler­cq 1680 pg. 86)

(Gaspesian/Micmac Indi­ans)

“These peo­ple had received in times past a knowl­edge of the Gospel and of Chris­tian­i­ty, which they have final­ly lost through the neg­li­gence and the licen­tious­ness of their ances­tors.”
(Cler­cq 1680 pg. 86)

(In ref­er­ence to the North Amer­i­can Indians)

“It is said among their prin­ci­pal or beloved men, that they have it hand­ed down from their ances­tors, that the book which the white peo­ple have was once theirs. That while they say that their fore­fa­thers were pos­sessed of an extra­or­di­nary divine spir­it, by which they fore­told future events, and con­trolled the com­mon course of nature, and this they trans­mit­ted to their off­spring, on con­di­tion of their obey­ing the sacred laws. That they did by these means bring down show­ers of plen­ty on the beloved peo­ple. But that this pow­er, for a long time past, had entire­ly ceased.”
(Boudinet 1816 pg. 114)

“Colonel M. inquired why the Indi­ans had not learned these arts of the white peo­ple. He replied indef­i­nite­ly, relat­ing that the Great Spir­it had once giv­en the Indi­ans a book, which taught them all these arts, but that they had lost it, and had nev­er since regained the knowl­edge of them.”
(M​.​H. Frost 1819; On the abo­rig­ines of the West­ern Countries)

Accord­ing to an old Chero­kee quot­ed by Buttrick:

“God gave the red man a book and a paper and told him to write, but he mere­ly made marks on the paper, and as he could not read or write, the Lord gave him a bow and arrows, and gave the book to the white man.” Boudinot, in “A Star in the West,”‘ quot­ed by the same author, says: “They have it hand­ed down from their ances­tors, that the book which the white peo­ple have was once theirs; that while they had it they pros­pered exceed­ing­ly; but that the white peo­ple bought it of them and learned many things from it, while the Indi­ans lost cred­it, offend­ed the Great Spir­it, and suf­fered exceed­ing­ly from the neigh­bor­ing nations; that the Great Spir­it took pity on them and direct­ed them to this coun­try,”
(Mooney 1902 pg. 483)

“Accord­ing to Mor­gan, the Musco­gee prop­er, and per­haps also their incor­po­rat­ed tribes, have 22 clans. Of these the Wind appears to be the lead­ing one, pos­sess­ing priv­i­leges accord­ed to no oth­er clan, includ­ing the hered­i­tary guardian­ship of the ancient met­al tablets which con­sti­tute the pal­la­di­um of the tribe.” (Pal­la­di­um in the 19thand 18thcen­tu­ry means for safe­ty)
(Mooney 1902 pg. 499)

Hieroglyphs

Anthro­pol­o­gist do not rec­og­nize the Amer­i­can Indi­ans as hav­ing a writ­ten lan­guage. The Book of Mor­mon and tra­di­tion­al Native Amer­i­can accounts and exam­ples hiero­glyph­ic char­ac­ters speak dif­fer­ent­ly to this assump­tion. The Book of Mor­mon says they did have a writ­ten lan­guage but this abil­i­ty was lost with the extinc­tion of the Nephites/Hopewell Indi­ans. What was left was hiero­glyphs in its most basic form.

There are four Mic­mac hiero­glyph char­ac­ters found in their Book of Pray that resem­ble Egypt­ian Hieroglyphs.

“He pro­pos­es in anoth­er work to present the cus­toms, beliefs, and rites of the Ojib­ways as they are, and to give the secret motives and caus­es there­of, also giv­ing a com­plete expo­si­tion of their grand reli­gious rite, accom­pa­nied with the ancient and sacred hiero­glyph­ics per­tain­ing there­to, with their inter­pre­ta­tion, spec­i­mens of their reli­gious idiom, their com­mon lan­guage, their songs. “
(Williams 1885, pg. 5)

“To sup­port their pre­ten­sions, this fam­i­ly hold in their pos­ses­sion a cir­cu­lar plate of vir­gin cop­per, on which is rude­ly marked inden­ta­tions and hiero­glyph­ics denot­ing the num­ber of gen­er­a­tions of the fam­i­ly who have passed away since they first pitched their lodges at Shaug-a-waum-ik-ong and took pos­ses­sion of the adja­cent coun­try, includ­ing the Island of La Pointe or Mo-ning­wun-a-kaun-ing.”
(Williams 1885, pg. 63)

”Yet they have cer­tain hiero­glyph­ics, by which they describe facts in so plain a man­ner, that those who are con­ver­sant with those marks can under­stand them with the great­est ease, as eas­i­ly, indeed, as we can under­stand a piece of writ­ing. For instance, on a piece of bark, or on a large tree with the bark tak­en off for the pur­pose, by the side of a path, they can and do give every nec­es­sary infor­ma­tion to those who come by the same way… although they have not all the same marks; yet I have seen the Delawares read with ease the draw­ings of the Chippe­ways, Min­goes, Shaw-anos, and Wyan­dots, on sim­i­lar sub­jects. “
(Heck­ewelder 1881 pg. 130)

Below is a 1590 depic­tion of a Native Amer­i­can by Theodore Bry. The sym­bols shown on the body are marks worn by men to show their affil­i­a­tion: “where­by it may be known what Prince’s sub­jects they be, or of what place they have their origin.”

Excavated Hopewell antler tines and engraved bone tools

Micmac Characters

Father Chret­ian Le Cler­cq a Roman Catholic mis­sion­ary lived among the Mic­mac Indi­ans for twelve years. After spend­ing this time with the Mic­mac, he then sailed back to France and wrote a book about the cus­toms and reli­gion of the Mic­mac Indians.

He helped the Mic­mac Indi­ans devel­op a writ­ten lan­guage com­posed of Hiero­glyphs. He most like­ly used the char­ac­ters that the Mic­mac Indi­ans were already famil­iar with. If Cler­cq him­self had devel­oped the writ­ten lan­guage he most like­ly would have used the Latin alpha­bet — the lan­guage he grew up read­ing and writ­ing with.

Four Mic­mac char­ac­ters are sim­i­lar to Egypt­ian Hiero­glyphs in appear­ance and mean­ing. Oth­er Mic­mac char­ac­ters are sim­i­lar to char­ac­ters found on the Anthon Transcript.

The Anthon Tran­script is the piece of paper on which Joseph Smith tran­scribed char­ac­ters from the gold­en plates so that he could show Dr. Charles Anton. Anton was an Egyp­tol­o­gist that was con­firm the valid­i­ty of the gold­en plates trans­la­tion. Per the his­to­ry, Anton described the char­ac­ters as Egypt­ian, Chaldean and Assyrian.

Comparative chart showing four surviving reformed Egyptian characters alongside Micmac ideograms and Ojibwe petroglyphs

Detailed glyph transcription comparing Native American petroglyphs with Demotic and hieratic Egyptian characters

Chaldean

Photograph of a prehistoric stone carving depicting a mastodon or elephant effigy discovered in Iowa

In all like­li­hood, a “reformed Egypt­ian” would include Egypt­ian hiero­glyph­ics and Chaldean characters.

Michmash

In the Old Tes­ta­ment there is a city that still exist today known today as Mikhmas and known in the Old Tes­ta­ment as Mich­mash. In the Old Tes­ta­ment the pro­nun­ci­a­tion of Mich­mash is very sim­i­lar to the name of the Mic­mac tribe. Based on their sim­i­lar beliefs and their Book of Prayers char­ac­ters, I believe the Mic­mac tribe are direct descen­dants of the Nephites/Hopewell Indi­ans and sur­vived the Nephite geno­cide by escap­ing to the North. Their geo­graph­i­cal loca­tion above the hill Cumorah and oth­er fac­tors such as a nomadic lifestyle, being dec­i­mat­ed by sick­ness, as well as wars with the Iro­quois, offers more evi­dence to sup­port this con­clu­sion. Based on the Iro­quois beliefs and tra­di­tions, the Iro­quois are the best can­di­date to be pri­mar­i­ly respon­si­ble for the extinc­tion of the Nephites.

Mich­mash in Hebrew means “some­thing hid­den”. Dur­ing the Nephite geno­cide any sur­viv­ing Nephites would have to join the Laman­ites or hide. The very name of Mic­mac, if relat­ed to Mich­mash, tes­ti­fies of this.

Hebrew and Greek language comparisons

There are exam­ples of Hebrew cus­toms, char­ac­ters, beliefs and lan­guage among Native Amer­i­cans. Accord­ing to Mor­mon, they knew how to write in Hebrew and of course had Hebrew cus­toms and beliefs (Mor­mon 9​:33). The Greek lan­guage is also com­pared to the Native Amer­i­can lan­guages of the Indians.

“Antipas– name of a gen­er­al in the BoM (Alma 56); name of a moun­tain in the BoM (Alma 47​:7, 10); It is a Greek name, an abbre­vi­a­tion for ‘Antipa­ter.’

Archean­tus– Nephite com­man­der (Moroni 9​:2); a typ­i­cal Greek for­ma­tion, made using the Greek pre­fix ‘arch-‘ (“great, chief”), as in the Bib­li­cal Greek names Archelaus and Archippus.

Judea– the name of a Nephite city (Alma 56, 57); it is the Greek (i​.​e., New Tes­ta­ment) form of the Hebrew name ‘Judah,’ refer­ring to the tribe, the South­ern King­dom, and the area of south­ern Pales­tine occu­pied by the tribe of Judah (the Jews).

Ango­la– city name at Mor­mon 2​:4 – Greek ‘ange­los’, mean­ing ’angel’”

Mor­mon 9​:33 – And if our plates had been suf­fi­cient­ly large we should have writ­ten in Hebrew; but the Hebrew hath been altered by us also; and if we could have writ­ten in Hebrew, behold, ye would have had no imper­fec­tion in our record.

Creek Indi­ans also had sim­i­lar­i­ties to the Hebrew lan­guage. Con­sid­er­ing that Nephites became Laman­ites and Laman­ites became Nephites this is not surprising:

“The name of the Creeks for man, is ish­to, and so it is in Hebrew…The same remark might be made with respect to the word Kenaai, for Canaan. Jeho­vah they call Y‑he-ho-wah. The roof of the house they call toubano­ra; in the Hebrew it is debonaour. The nose they call nichiri in Hebrew, neheri. The great first cause, Yo-hewah; in Hebrew, Jeho­vah. Praise the first cause, in their lan­guage, hal­leluwah; in Hebrew, hal­lelu­jah. Father they call abba; the same in Hebrew. Now they call na; in Hebrew, na. To pray they call pli­ale; in Hebrew, pha­lae. In their lan­guage, abel is manslaugh­ter; the same in Hebrew. Wife, awah; in Hebrew, eve, or eweh. Win­ter, kora in Hebrew, cora. God, Ale; in Hebrew, Ale, or Alo­hi­ni. A high moun­tain, ararat; the same by the Indi­ans of Penob­scot.”
(Hay­wood 1823 pg. 282)

Silas T Rand knew sev­er­al lan­guages to include Hebrew con­cern­ing Mic­mac Indians:

“There are also some words in the lan­guage which resem­ble Greek. The Mic­mac word Ellenu, an Indi­an, is not very dif­fer­ent from Hel­lene, a Greek. Ellenu esit (“He speaks Mic­mac”) is strik­ing­ly like the Greek, hel­l­enizei (“He speaks Greek”). But in oth­er respects the lan­guage resem­bles the Hebrew, espe­cial­ly in the suf­fix­es by which the pro­nouns are con­nect­ed in the accusative case with the verb.”
(Silas T Rand 1893)

“Their lan­guages are very diverse and dif­fers as much from one anoth­er as Dutch, French, Greek and Latin. Declen­sion and con­ju­ga­tion resem­ble those in Greek, for they, like the Greeks, Have duals in their nouns and even aug­ments in their verbs.”
(In Mohawk Coun­try: Ear­ly Nar­ra­tives About a Native People)

“Shilu in Indi­an is the same as Shiloh in Hebrew; the Indi­an word for father is Abba; the word for “wait­er of the high priest” is Sagan in both Indi­an and Hebrew; the word for man in Indi­an is Ish or Ishie.”
(Adair 1735)

Gaspesian/Micmac Indi­ans:

“Our Indi­ans agree with the Greeks and Latins in this, that they use always the sin­gu­lar, and almost nev­er, or at least very rarely, the plur­al, even when they speak to their mis­sion­ar­ies, or to some oth­er per­son of promi­nence. They express them­selves by the word kir^ which means “thou,” whether it is the child speak­ing to its father, the wife to her hus­band, or the hus­band to his wife.”
(Cler­cq 1680 pg. 141)

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted

[…] Tribe of Man­asseh — Tech­nol­o­gy and Animals […]

Jamie B

Well writ­ten and stat­ed very well, Dave. I enjoyed read­ing this immense­ly. I believe also that in times of severe famine (and maybe it’s con­nect­ed with ancient vol­canic activ­i­ty in places or weath­er pat­terns like hap­pened with Tamb­o­ra and oth­ers,) that they may have leaned on what was eas­i­est to find and eat and USE for cloth­ing and such. This would be the hors­es and Mam­moths and oth­er domes­ti­cat­ed ani­mals, some of which may have also suc­cumbed to the famine states present at the time.