Archeological Evidence of the Fortified cities by the East Sea

Arche­o­log­i­cal Evi­dence of the For­ti­fied Cities by the East Sea

This evi­dence is based on the Six Sea Mod­el
http://​bookof​mor​monev​i​dence​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​1​6​/​0​9​/​a​l​m​a​—​c​h​a​p​t​e​r​—​2​2​—​b​o​m​—​m​a​p.html

I will be using the Hopewell mound for­ti­fi­ca­tions found in New York State and Penn­syl­va­nia for arche­o­log­i­cal evi­dence for the for­ti­fi­ca­tions described in Alma Chap­ter 50 and refor­ti­fied in Alma Chap­ter 52. E​.​G Sqi­uer and Charles Whit­ney described these for­ti­fi­ca­tions before many of the sites were destroyed by farm­ers and set­tlers in the 18thand 19the cen­tu­ry. First is a visu­al descrip­tion of as described in the Book of Mor­mon and a com­par­i­son between Charles Whit­ney and E​.​G Squiers descriptions.

Moroni needs to pre­pare the Nephite ter­ri­to­ries from con­sis­tent attacks by the Laman­ites. One area in par­tic­u­lar needs par­tic­u­lar atten­tion that would be the east wilder­ness. Through the Nia­gra isth­mus the Laman­ites would have access to the Land North­ward Boun­ti­ful and Jer­shon. Moroni (Alma Chap­ter 50) clears out the Laman­ites from the east wilder­ness and has the Nephites occu­py the land and build for­ti­fi­ca­tions. Moroni (Alma Chap­ter 52) refor­ti­fies the area from attack.

http://​bookof​mor​monev​i​dence​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​1​6​/​0​9​/​a​l​m​a​—​c​h​a​p​t​e​r​—​5​9​—​b​o​m​—​m​a​p.html
http://​bookof​mor​monev​i​dence​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​1​6​/​0​9​/​a​l​m​a​—​c​h​a​p​t​e​r​—​5​2​—​b​o​m​—​m​a​p.html

Regional map showing surveyed archaeological sites of fortified earthwork settlements near the proposed East Sea region

Topographic survey of earthwork embankments and ditch enclosures at an ancient fortified site

Diagram of timber palisades and earthen ditch ramparts corresponding to Nephite city fortification descriptions

Cross-section diagram illustrating an earthen wall ditch and parapet fortification structure

These are the descrip­tions of the for­ti­fi­ca­tions that the Nephites built

Con­cern­ing this line of for­ti­fi­ca­tions Charles Whit­tle­sey said: That they formed a well occu­pied line, con­struct­ed either to pro­tect the advance of a nation land­ing from the lake (Lake Erie) and mov­ing south­ward for con­quest; or, a line of resis­tance for a peo­ple inhab­it­ing these shores and pressed upon by their south­ern neigh­bors. (Quot­ed in R. Sil­ver­berg, Mound Builders of Ancient Amer­i­ca, p. 116.)

E​.​G Sqi­er stat­ed: Sys­tem of Defens­es extend­ing from the sources of the Alleghe­ny and Susque­han­na in New York, diag­o­nal­ly across the coun­try, through cen­tral and north­ern Ohio, to the Wabash. (Ancient Mon­u­ments, p. 44.)

Charles sec­ond descrip­tion for the rea­son­ing behind these for­ti­fi­ca­tions match­es the rea­son­ing for Moroni to build these for­ti­fi­ca­tions. The Laman­ites attacked from the areas south of these for­ti­fi­ca­tions or the low­er part of New York state. Moroni secured the land north­ward and a sec­ond entry in the land Bountiful.

(Glenn Chap­man helped in the com­pi­la­tion of sources)

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Jeff Burr

Thank you for shar­ing your ideas, I appre­ci­ate your dri­ve and pas­sion in spread­ing your theories.

I’m not sure, but I’m wor­ried that you’re expe­ri­enc­ing what is known as “Con­fir­ma­tion Bias”. I also accept the fact that I may also be a vic­tim of con­fir­ma­tion bias on the oth­er end of the spec­trum here, I think it’s worth look­ing deep­er for more find­ings or arti­facts in the area.

The way I see it, and I’m just try­ing to be hon­est here, is that Joseph used the area around him as inspi­ra­tion for the set­ting of the Book of Mor­mon. Joseph knew the maps of this area very well and he had a very active imag­i­na­tion as a child and a fas­ci­na­tion for the native peo­ple (accord­ing to his moth­er).

Maybe you’re right, maybe you’re wrong. Who knows?

All I know is that there is more sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence against the Book of Mor­mon (like DNA, or the lack of hors­es, char­i­ots, steel, etc) and any­thing “prov­ing” it can eas­i­ly be seen anoth­er way. We’ve all seen sim­i­lar reports from South Amer­i­ca or Cen­tral Amer­i­ca, but it’s always the ruins of a wall or small build­ing — some­thing that can eas­i­ly be seen as some­thing else.

Here’s a sim­i­lar arti­cle that, if viewed through the eyes of con­fir­ma­tion bias, can help prove the lit­er­al exis­tence of the Lord of the Rings.

Jeff Burr

I can see how evi­dence lines up to show the con­sis­ten­cy of the Book of Mor­mon, espe­cial­ly if you over­look cer­tain infor­ma­tion that would lead you to a dif­fer­ent conclusion. Your first link on DNA:The blog admits the dates of the X2a’j mark­er are a prob­lem, but then focus on shapes instead. The real­i­ty is that the X2a’j genet­ic mark­er, accord­ing to sci­en­tists much smarter than either of us, is between 14,000 and 20,200 years old. This is thou­sands of years before the time of Nephi, it’s even old­er than the earth (accord­ing to my sem­i­nary teacher). Also, men­tion­ing it as the “5‑ton ele­phant in the room” reminds me of Ether 9​:19 which says ele­phants were in North Amer­i­ca at the time of Omer. Your sec­ond link on Hopewell:Again, the blog seems to leave out a few points in order to prove the the­o­ry true. The first point that you don’t quote from the arti­cle ref­er­enced is the word “mete­oric”. In fact, an arti­cle linked in the report says, “These beads are made from mete­oric iron, which is so pure it does​n’t need to be smelt­ed.” and even, “There was no iron smelt­ing in North Amer­i­ca until around A​.​D. 1000, when Vikings brought the tech­nol­o­gy with them to the briefly occu­pied site of L’Anse aux Mead­ows in New­found­land. It did​n’t catch on among the indige­nous pop­u­la­tion and was​n’t rein­tro­duced until after A​.​D. 1492. But just as in Egypt, iron arti­facts are found at much ear­li­er sites, and the expla­na­tion is the same.”… Read more »

Jeff Burr

To fur­ther dri­ve the point about DNA and the Book of Mor­mon: This is from Wikipedia: “Sub-group X2 appears to have under­gone exten­sive pop­u­la­tion expan­sion and dis­per­sal around or soon after the Last Glacial Max­i­mum, about 21,000 years ago”. It seems like you’re jump­ing to con­clu­sions about the cul­tur­al prac­tices of a com­mu­ni­ty of which you have almost no knowl­edge. See­ing com­mon shapes or designs would require a mas­sive leap in log­ic to reach your con­clu­sions. Your first link does­n’t have any sources, but a Google Image search of the pic­tures returns the Moundville Archae­o­log­i­cal Site. The Wikipedia page, which is backed up by sci­en­tif­ic sources, does not men­tion Hebrew or Jew­ish con­nec­tions in any way. Using this log­ic, one could say Hin­duism and Occultism have Hebrew ori­gins because the use of a Hexa­gram. Your sec­ond link jumps to sim­i­lar con­clu­sions. How many cul­tures have sacred build­ings? I think it might be eas­i­er to count cul­tures that did­n’t build sacred or reli­gious buildings. Your third link can be seen as evi­dence that Joseph made the whole thing up by using phras­es, names and loca­tions from his surroundings. There’s no ques­tion that hors­es, mam­moths and bison exist­ed in the Amer­i­c­as at one point. We know this because of actu­al sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence. What we also know because of this evi­dence is that the hors­es that were here became extinct thou­sands of years before the dates claimed in the Book of Mormon. I’d love to see your sources of ele­phant shaped smoke pipes, I could­n’t… Read more »

Robert Oldale

Iran? Does­n’t that sound famil­iar? 70 years cap­tive in baby­lon: Iran? Come on.…..