My Search for Truth by Wes T · 16 chapters
Chapter 2 of 16

Chapter Two

Should We Avoid Doubts and Questions?

There is a real fear among the some faith­ful that ques­tion­ing the verac­i­ty of the church or the Book of Mor­mon is a sure way to lose your soul to the dev­il. I think this mind­set is at odds with the more cen­tral, key teach­ing of the LDS church, which is even taught as the dri­ver behind the foun­da­tion of the church. Joseph received his first vision after being struck by the promise of James:

James 1:5
If any of you lack wis­dom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men lib­er­al­ly, and upbraideth not; and it shall be giv­en him.

The Book of Mor­mon sim­i­lar­ly teaches:

Moroni 10:4–5
And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eter­nal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sin­cere heart, with real intent, hav­ing faith in Christ, he will man­i­fest the truth of it unto you, by the pow­er of the Holy Ghost. And by the pow­er of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things.

When Oliv­er Cow­dery want­ed to be able to trans­late, the Lord through Joseph Smith, Jr said:

D&C 9:8
But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn with­in you; there­fore, you shall feel that it is right.

In our church, we believe in per­son­al rev­e­la­tion. We believe that we can and should ques­tion any­thing and every­thing, and God will give us the wis­dom we lack. We clear­ly teach that in order to receive that answer, we must first do the leg­work — we “must study it out in [our] mind” and then bring our con­clu­sion to God for con­fir­ma­tion. I see no prob­lem, in fact I think it should be expect­ed for us to do the same with any doubt or ques­tion we have, espe­cial­ly con­cern­ing God and his church.

Inter­est­ing­ly, through­out time church lead­ers have pro­claimed that because the LDS church is the true church of God, that the church should with­stand any inves­ti­ga­tion or exam­i­na­tion into the truth claims. Here some of the sup­port­ing quotes (my empha­sis added):

“The nature of the mes­sage in the Book of Mor­mon is such that, if true, no one can pos­si­bly be saved and reject it, if false, no one can pos­si­bly be saved and receive it. There­fore, every soul in all the world is equal­ly inter­est­ed in ascer­tain­ing its truth or fal­si­ty. In a mat­ter of such infi­nite impor­tance, no per­son should rest sat­is­fied with the con­jec­tures or opin­ions of oth­ers. He should use every exer­tion him­self to become acquaint­ed with the nature of the mes­sage; he should care­ful­ly exam­ine the evi­dences of which it is offered to the world; he should, with all patience and per­se­ver­ance, seek to acquire a cer­tain knowl­edge whether it be of God or not. If, after a rigid exam­i­na­tion, it be found an impo­si­tion, it should be exten­sive­ly pub­lished to the world as such. The evi­dence and argu­ments upon which the impos­ture was detect­ed should be clear­ly and log­i­cal­ly stat­ed, that those who have been sin­cere­ly, yet unfor­tu­nate­ly, deceived may per­ceive the nature of the decep­tion, and be reclaimed, and that those who con­tin­ue to pub­lish the delu­sion may be exposed and silenced.” Orson Pratt; 1850, Intro­duc­tion to Divine Authen­tic­i­ty of the Book of Mormon.

“If faith will not bear to be inves­ti­gat­ed; if its preach­ers and pro­fes­sors are afraid to have it exam­ined, their foun­da­tion must be very weak.” — George A. Smith; 1871, Jour­nal of Dis­cours­es, Vol. 14, pg. 216

“Mor­monism must stand or fall on the sto­ry of Joseph Smith. He was either a Prophet of God, divine­ly called, prop­er­ly appoint­ed and com­mis­sioned or he was one of the biggest frauds this world has ever seen. There is no mid­dle ground. If Joseph was a deceiv­er, who will­ful­ly attempt­ed to mis­lead peo­ple, then he should be exposed, his claims should be refut­ed, and his doc­trines shown to be false...” (Prophet Joseph Field­ing Smith, Doc­trines of Sal­va­tion (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954), vol. 1 pp 188–189)

“If we have the truth, it can­not be harmed by inves­ti­ga­tion. If we have not the truth, it ought to be harmed.” — Apos­tle J. Reuben Clark, D. Michael Quinn, J. Reuben Clark: The Church Years. Pro­vo, Utah: Brigham Young Uni­ver­si­ty Press, 1983, p. 24.

“Well, we have noth­ing to hide. Our his­to­ry is an open book. They may find what they are look­ing for, but the fact is the his­to­ry of the church is clear and open and leads to faith and strength and virtues.” — Prophet Gor­don B. Hinck­ley, Dec. 25, 2005 inter­view with The Asso­ci­at­ed Press

“Well, it’s either true or false. If it’s false, we’re engaged in a great fraud. If it’s true, it’s the most impor­tant thing in the world. Now, that’s the whole pic­ture. It is either right or wrong, true or false, fraud­u­lent or true. And that’s exact­ly where we stand, with a con­vic­tion in our hearts that it is true: that Joseph went into the Grove; that he saw the Father and the Son; that he talked with them; that Moroni came; that the Book of Mor­mon was trans­lat­ed from the plates; that the priest­hood was restored by those who held it ancient­ly. That’s our claim. That’s where we stand, and that’s where we fall, if we fall. But we don’t. We just stand secure in that faith.” — Prophet Gor­don B. Hinck­ley, Inter­view “The Mor­mons”; PBS Doc­u­men­tary, April 2007

“This book [The Book of Mor­mon] is enti­tled to the most thor­ough and impar­tial exam­i­na­tion. Not only does the Book of Mor­mon mer­it such con­sid­er­a­tion, its claims even demand the same.” — Apos­tle James E. Tal­mage, Arti­cles of Faith, pg. 273

So does a “most thor­ough and impar­tial exam­i­na­tion” mean we should read the Book of Mor­mon and see if it makes us feel good? That is any­thing but thor­ough or impar­tial. Still, if we do read it and pray and feel good about the book, does that mean that it is from God?

Wes Avatar
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
James Allred

Hel­lo Wes. I have read the Book of Mor­mon many times dur­ing my life. For the most part, I have read it in the way almost all mor­mons read it. As a rit­u­al. I hope I don’t offend any­one. But from my lived expe­ri­ence, that descrip­tions feels cor­rect to me. Dur­ing the past 5 years I have stud­ied the Book of Mor­mon 8 times cov­er to cov­er. Each time I have stud­ied it I have stud­ied it with a dif­fer­ent ques­tion, in order to tru­ly read it for the first time with a true intent to study as opposed to spend 20 min­utes a day in a ritual. The most recent time I stud­ied it, I did so to under­stand what exact­ly is the gospel of sal­va­tion taught in the Book of Mormon. This link is a quick sum­ma­ry of what it teaches: Their were two fas­ci­nat­ing find­ings to me from this study. 1) What the Book of Mor­mon (which con­tains the full­ness of the gospel) does not teach. and 2) That the descrip­tion of what hap­pens after the res­ur­rec­tion and final judg­ment are incon­sis­tent with what is taught in sun­day school today. So my ques­tion for you, how do you rec­on­cile this dis­con­nect? Or have you even noticed this disconnect? Why does the Book of Mor­mon teach that every­one goes to hell, sub­ject to the Dev­il, nev­er to return after the judge­ment, except only those who accept­ed Christ in this life and endured to the end? This group also includes chil­dren who died and those… Read more »

James Allred

In my ortho­dox days I pret­ty much either ignored this doc­tri­nal issue or just shelved it. If I did think about it, I assumed I was some­how miss­ing some­thing and it all need­ed to make sense to those who were smarter than me. Because clear­ly I knew it was true and I also knew what the plan of sal­va­tion looked like. So if there were any issues, they were mine. But after seri­ous study of being will­ing to just read the Book of Mor­mon for what it says, as opposed to what I thought it said, it was very clear. The plan of redemption/salvation taught in the book of mor­mon teach­es a lit­er­al hell after the res­ur­rec­tion and judg­ment. It is repeat­ed­ly and clear­ly taught. The kick­er for me was to read D&C 19 where God admits to hav­ing allowed this false doc­trine to be taught. He said he did to work upon the hearts of the peo­ple. But at the time D&C 19 was received God was still refer­ring to this (that hell real­ly does end and is not eter­nal) as a mys­tery and Mar­tin Har­ris should not share this doc­trine with oth­ers. It was meat and at that time only milk was allowed. I was left with a chal­leng­ing ques­tion. If God had allowed a false doc­trine to be taught for 1000 years in the Book of Mor­mon, how could I ever be cer­tain that what was being taught today was now the “real” and “true” doctrine? Clear­ly you can tell that… Read more »