There is a real fear among the some faithÂful that quesÂtionÂing the veracÂiÂty of the church or the Book of MorÂmon is a sure way to lose your soul to the devÂil. I think this mindÂset is at odds with the more cenÂtral, key teachÂing of the LDS church, which is even taught as the driÂver behind the founÂdaÂtion of the church. Joseph received his first vision after being struck by the promise of James:
James 1â:5
If any of you lack wisÂdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men libÂerÂalÂly, and upbraideth not; and it shall be givÂen him.
The Book of MorÂmon simÂiÂlarÂly teaches:
Moroni 10:4â5
And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the EterÂnal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sinÂcere heart, with real intent, havÂing faith in Christ, he will manÂiÂfest the truth of it unto you, by the powÂer of the Holy Ghost. And by the powÂer of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things.
When OlivÂer CowÂdery wantÂed to be able to transÂlate, the Lord through Joseph Smith, Jr said:
D&C 9â:8
But, behold, I say unto you, that you must study it out in your mind; then you must ask me if it be right, and if it is right I will cause that your bosom shall burn withÂin you; thereÂfore, you shall feel that it is right.
In our church, we believe in perÂsonÂal revÂeÂlaÂtion. We believe that we can and should quesÂtion anyÂthing and everyÂthing, and God will give us the wisÂdom we lack. We clearÂly teach that in order to receive that answer, we must first do the legÂworkâ we âmust study it out in [our] mindâ and then bring our conÂcluÂsion to God for conÂfirÂmaÂtion. I see no probÂlem, in fact I think it should be expectÂed for us to do the same with any doubt or quesÂtion we have, espeÂcialÂly conÂcernÂing God and his church.
InterÂestÂingÂly, throughÂout time church leadÂers have proÂclaimed that because the LDS church is the true church of God, that the church should withÂstand any invesÂtiÂgaÂtion or examÂiÂnaÂtioninto the truth claims. Here some of the supÂportÂing quotes (my emphaÂsis added):
âThe nature of the mesÂsage in the Book of MorÂmon is such that, if true, no one can posÂsiÂbly be saved and reject it, if false, no one can posÂsiÂbly be saved and receive it. ThereÂfore, every soul in all the world is equalÂly interÂestÂed in ascerÂtainÂing its truth or falÂsiÂty. In a matÂter of such infiÂnite imporÂtance, no perÂson should rest satÂisÂfied with the conÂjecÂtures or opinÂions of othÂers. He should use every exerÂtion himÂself to become acquaintÂed with the nature of the mesÂsage; he should careÂfulÂly examÂine the eviÂdences of which it is offered to the world; he should, with all patience and perÂseÂverÂance, seek to acquire a cerÂtain knowlÂedge whether it be of God or not. If, after a rigid examÂiÂnaÂtion, it be found an impoÂsiÂtion, it should be extenÂsiveÂly pubÂlished to the world as such. The eviÂdence and arguÂments upon which the imposÂture was detectÂed should be clearÂly and logÂiÂcalÂly statÂed, that those who have been sinÂcereÂly, yet unforÂtuÂnateÂly, deceived may perÂceive the nature of the decepÂtion, and be reclaimed, and that those who conÂtinÂue to pubÂlish the deluÂsion may be exposed and silenced.â Orson Pratt; 1850, IntroÂducÂtion to Divine AuthenÂticÂiÂty of the Book of Mormon.
âIf faith will not bearto be invesÂtiÂgatÂed; if its preachÂers and proÂfesÂsors are afraid to have it examÂined, their founÂdaÂtion must be very weak.â â George A. Smith; 1871, JourÂnal of DisÂcoursÂes, Vol. 14, pg. 216
âMorÂmonism must stand or fall on the stoÂry of Joseph Smith. He was either a Prophet of God, divineÂly called, propÂerÂly appointÂed and comÂmisÂsioned or he was one of the biggest frauds this world has ever seen. There is no midÂdle ground. If Joseph was a deceivÂer, who willÂfulÂly attemptÂed to misÂlead peoÂple, then he should be exposed, his claims should be refutÂed, and his docÂtrines shown to be false...â (Prophet Joseph FieldÂing Smith, DocÂtrines of SalÂvaÂtion (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1954), vol. 1 pp 188â189)
âIf we have the truth, it canÂnot be harmed by invesÂtiÂgaÂtion. If we have not the truth, it ought to be harmed.â â AposÂtle J. Reuben Clark, D. Michael Quinn, J. Reuben Clark: The Church Years. ProÂvo, Utah: Brigham Young UniÂverÂsiÂty Press, 1983, p. 24.
âWell, we have nothÂing to hide. Our hisÂtoÂry is an open book. They may find what they are lookÂing for, but the fact is the hisÂtoÂry of the church is clear and open and leads to faith and strength and virtues.â â Prophet GorÂdon B. HinckÂley, Dec. 25, 2005 interÂview with The AssoÂciÂatÂed Press
âWell, itâs either true or false. If itâs false, weâre engaged in a great fraud. If itâs true, itâs the most imporÂtant thing in the world. Now, thatâs the whole picÂture. It is either right or wrong, true or false, fraudÂuÂlent or true. And thatâs exactÂly where we stand, with a conÂvicÂtion in our hearts that it is true: that Joseph went into the Grove; that he saw the Father and the Son; that he talked with them; that Moroni came; that the Book of MorÂmon was transÂlatÂed from the plates; that the priestÂhood was restored by those who held it ancientÂly. Thatâs our claim. Thatâs where we stand, and thatâs where we fall, if we fall. But we donât. We just stand secure in that faith.â â Prophet GorÂdon B. HinckÂley, InterÂview âThe MorÂmonsâ; PBS DocÂuÂmenÂtary, April 2007
âThis book [The Book of MorÂmon] is entiÂtled to the most thorÂough and imparÂtial examÂiÂnaÂtion. Not only does the Book of MorÂmon merÂit such conÂsidÂerÂaÂtion, its claims even demand the same.â â AposÂtle James E. TalÂmage, ArtiÂcles of Faith, pg. 273
So does a âmost thorÂough and imparÂtial examÂiÂnaÂtionâ mean we should read the Book of MorÂmon and see if it makes us feel good? That is anyÂthing but thorÂough or imparÂtial. Still, if we do read it and pray and feel good about the book, does that mean that it is from God?

HelÂlo Wes. I have read the Book of MorÂmon many times durÂing my life. For the most part, I have read it in the way almost all morÂmons read it. As a ritÂuÂal. I hope I donât offend anyÂone. But from my lived expeÂriÂence, that descripÂtions feels corÂrect to me. DurÂing the past 5 years I have studÂied the Book of MorÂmon 8 times covÂer to covÂer. Each time I have studÂied it I have studÂied it with a difÂferÂent quesÂtion, in order to truÂly read it for the first time with a true intent to study as opposed to spend 20 minÂutes a day in a ritual. The most recent time I studÂied it, I did so to underÂstand what exactÂly is the gospel of salÂvaÂtion taught in the Book of Mormon. This link is a quick sumÂmaÂry of what it teachÂes: Their were two fasÂciÂnatÂing findÂings to me from this study. 1) What the Book of MorÂmon (which conÂtains the fullÂness of the gospel) does not teach. and 2) That the descripÂtion of what hapÂpens after the resÂurÂrecÂtion and final judgÂment are inconÂsisÂtent with what is taught in sunÂday school today. So my quesÂtion for you, how do you recÂonÂcile this disÂconÂnect? Or have you even noticed this disconnect? Why does the Book of MorÂmon teach that everyÂone goes to hell, subÂject to the DevÂil, nevÂer to return after the judgeÂment, except only those who acceptÂed Christ in this life and endured to the end? This group also includes chilÂdren who died and those… Read more »
James, Iâve been thinkÂing about your comÂment, and how to respond. I very much appreÂciÂate the quesÂtion, and I am very glad you have called attenÂtion to it.It has been a few years for me now, since I read the Book of MorÂmon with the intenÂsiÂty and purÂpose you describe. I do keenÂly rememÂber the disÂconÂnect youâve described. It bothÂered me someÂtimes more, someÂtimes less, over the years. When I was active and believÂing, I attribÂuted the disÂconÂnect to very difÂferÂent causÂes than I do now, so we will start there.As a faithÂful, believÂing MorÂmon, I underÂstood that, while the peoÂple of the Book of MorÂmon had the fullÂness of the Gospel: the Melchizedek priestÂhood, temÂple ordiÂnances, etc., the text of the Book of MorÂmon was only a fracÂtion of their records (see Jacob 3â:13and 3 Nephi 26â:6), so we end up with an abbreÂviÂatÂed Plan of SalÂvaÂtion. Since I startÂed from the assumpÂtion that I âknewâ the Book of MorÂmon was âtrueâ, it was easy for me to conÂclude that any such disÂconÂnects were not actuÂalÂly disÂconÂnects, just simplifications. At this point, I take a difÂferÂent view. It is very clear that at the time Joseph was transÂlatÂing the Book of MorÂmon, he was much more of a Protestant/Methodist world view. Joseph in the Book of MorÂmon repeatÂedÂly, as your linked image points out, equates Jesus to being the very same âGod the Fatherâ, which the LDS church no longer accepts except when readÂing those Book of MorÂmon versÂes, using… Read more »
In my orthoÂdox days I pretÂty much either ignored this docÂtriÂnal issue or just shelved it. If I did think about it, I assumed I was someÂhow missÂing someÂthing and it all needÂed to make sense to those who were smarter than me. Because clearÂly I knew it was true and I also knew what the plan of salÂvaÂtion looked like. So if there were any issues, they were mine. But after seriÂous study of being willÂing to just read the Book of MorÂmon for what it says, as opposed to what I thought it said, it was very clear. The plan of redemption/salvation taught in the book of morÂmon teachÂes a litÂerÂal hell after the resÂurÂrecÂtion and judgÂment. It is repeatÂedÂly and clearÂly taught. The kickÂer for me was to read D&C 19 where God admits to havÂing allowed this false docÂtrine to be taught. He said he did to work upon the hearts of the peoÂple. But at the time D&C 19 was received God was still referÂring to this (that hell realÂly does end and is not eterÂnal) as a mysÂtery and MarÂtin HarÂris should not share this docÂtrine with othÂers. It was meat and at that time only milk was allowed. I was left with a chalÂlengÂing quesÂtion. If God had allowed a false docÂtrine to be taught for 1000 years in the Book of MorÂmon, how could I ever be cerÂtain that what was being taught today was now the ârealâ and âtrueâ doctrine? ClearÂly you can tell that… Read more »